RIP Satellite camps - Back from the Dead (4/28/16)

The Big Ten was the only P5 conference voting against, though. How much momentum is there really for a change back? Seems slim.


We don't know how those votes were carried out. My guess is that it was conference commissioners voting on behalf of the conference as a whole, which really means only voting on behalf of the vested interests of the top teams. If this vote was done per school and not per single representative per conference, I believe it would have turned out much differently.

 
It is just interesting that the NCAA takes a stand on this, but refuses to look into the shady recruiting practices of one of the biggest conferences in the P5...

 
That's a nonsensical comment from Shaw. Stanford logisticians will be quite disappointed.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's pretty transparently "We don't feel we need to do it ourselves, so let's make sure nobody can." I think it captures the impetus behind the move.

I'm so glad this was fast tracked. Clearly it was a big NCAA priority. Kudos for taking care of the SEC; at least the benefits are falling on a conference widely known for its total lack of underhanded recruiting tactics.

 
Shaw is a prick, but his full statement was basically, "I don't have an opinion. Some people do them, some people don't. We've never felt the need to." It wasn't pro-ban or anything like that, it was just unnecessarily pretentious.

 
Shaw is a prick, but his full statement was basically, "I don't have an opinion. Some people do them, some people don't. We've never felt the need to." It wasn't pro-ban or anything like that, it was just unnecessarily pretentious.
Especially when I know some of my friends who went to Stanford on athletic scholarships aren't exactly Mensa candidates. God love 'em.

 
What??? I thought he was against them?


OH.....I get it now. It screwed up something good he had going on and he didn't realize it was going to.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top