Landlord
Banned
No if Wiscy wins it will be because they played the toughest schedule and it caught up with them.
I've seen dozens of people on Huskerboard excited that we got to play Wisconsin when we did because of this exact reason.
No if Wiscy wins it will be because they played the toughest schedule and it caught up with them.
Why is my response confusing people?I've seen dozens of people on Huskerboard excited that we got to play Wisconsin when we did because of this exact reason.No if Wiscy wins it will be because they played the toughest schedule and it caught up with them.
UsuallyWhy is my response confusing people?I've seen dozens of people on Huskerboard excited that we got to play Wisconsin when we did because of this exact reason.No if Wiscy wins it will be because they played the toughest schedule and it caught up with them.
If Nebraska beats Wisconsin, the people downplaying this season so far will say "It's because Wisconsin has played a really tough schedule, so they were beat up from that. It's not because Nebraska is that good."
I don't personally believe that's true, but people on here and "expert analysts" will say it. Am I wrong?
But you said when Wiscy wins. Did you mean loses?Why is my response confusing people?I've seen dozens of people on Huskerboard excited that we got to play Wisconsin when we did because of this exact reason.No if Wiscy wins it will be because they played the toughest schedule and it caught up with them.
If Nebraska beats Wisconsin, the people downplaying this season so far will say "It's because Wisconsin has played a really tough schedule, so they were beat up from that. It's not because Nebraska is that good."
I don't personally believe that's true, but people on here and "expert analysts" will say it. Am I wrong?
Snuck out when no one was looking.Who let you out of the recruiting forum?
But you said when Wiscy wins. Did you mean loses?Why is my response confusing people?I've seen dozens of people on Huskerboard excited that we got to play Wisconsin when we did because of this exact reason.No if Wiscy wins it will be because they played the toughest schedule and it caught up with them.
If Nebraska beats Wisconsin, the people downplaying this season so far will say "It's because Wisconsin has played a really tough schedule, so they were beat up from that. It's not because Nebraska is that good."
I don't personally believe that's true, but people on here and "expert analysts" will say it. Am I wrong?
FOX Sports, Bruce Feldman
Sorry, Badger fans. I’m probably jinxing you by hopping on your bandwagon now. Even without Jack Cichy, I feel like Wisconsin is good enough on D to derail the Huskers and I’m still not sure NU and Tommy Armstrong can play a clean enough game to win in a tough road environment.
Wisconsin 23 - Nebraska 20
http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/gallery/odds-lines-point-spreads-schedule-week-9-picks-bruce-feldman-102716
I didn't say anything close to that. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.But you said when Wiscy wins. Did you mean loses?Why is my response confusing people?If Nebraska beats Wisconsin, the people downplaying this season so far will say "It's because Wisconsin has played a really tough schedule, so they were beat up from that. It's not because Nebraska is that good."I've seen dozens of people on Huskerboard excited that we got to play Wisconsin when we did because of this exact reason.No if Wiscy wins it will be because they played the toughest schedule and it caught up with them.
I don't personally believe that's true, but people on here and "expert analysts" will say it. Am I wrong?
Why is my response confusing people?I've seen dozens of people on Huskerboard excited that we got to play Wisconsin when we did because of this exact reason.No if Wiscy wins it will be because they played the toughest schedule and it caught up with them.
If Nebraska beats Wisconsin, the people downplaying this season so far will say "It's because Wisconsin has played a really tough schedule, so they were beat up from that. It's not because Nebraska is that good."
I don't personally believe that's true, but people on here and "expert analysts" will say it. Am I wrong?