Kernal
Starter
This Husker ChalkTalk blog has been doing these breakdowns all year and they're pretty good. Have a look at today's breakdown of the Wisconsin game.
Last edited by a moderator:
It is physical to, they go hand in hand.The blocking in those GIFs. I don't expect every play to work to perfection, e.g. a defender will fight off a block and just make a good play. I do expect our linemen to at least make contact. It's almost like they don't know what their assignments are or never practiced the play against this type of defense. Wiscy didn't appear to be doing anything unusual on those plays. At least these are fixable mental mistakes and not a lack of physical ability.![]()
Yeah, he does a good job of showing some of those type of things (missed blocks) that are easy to miss when just normally watching a game. (He has also pointed out some good plays we might miss, like a great WR block a week or two ago that I never would have seen).The blocking in those GIFs. I don't expect every play to work to perfection, e.g. a defender will fight off a block and just make a good play. I do expect our linemen to at least make contact. It's almost like they don't know what their assignments are or never practiced the play against this type of defense. Wiscy didn't appear to be doing anything unusual on those plays. At least these are fixable mental mistakes and not a lack of physical ability.![]()
Right now they are in a bad spot where they either play older, less talented guys or play guys that aren't ready yet. Next year could be in a better spot as some of those guys that are a year away could be ready. Gates-Foster-Decker-Farmer-Knevel-Farniok-Wilson-Barnett-Raridon-Brokop-Gaylord-Conrad will all be redshirt freshmen or older. That should give us some more viable options.Am I right in reading chalk talk that the inside runs were the lowest producer on yards per carry, but we did that 21 times........
Great stuff as usual, unfortunately it was in a loss.
Our OL will be in the same boat next year. Little depth, less experience......I hope we plunder the juco ranks. We are going to need it.
Yeah, that's a good point in that we do have a lot of younger, well-regarded guys in the bullpen. If most of them pan out, we'll be in great shape. I guess I'm still a little jaded in that all we've ever heard about is how good the new crop of recruits will be and then for the past decade or so many of them end up never playing or not being more than placeholders on the line. I mean, most of the upperclassmen who aren't starting now were once highly regarded recruits. You'd like to get four or five Nick Gates type of guys. If you listen to the recruiting hype, they're all like that. I guess maybe we have to hope Cavanaugh does a good job of developing them so we don't have to rely on once-in-a-decade hidden-gems.Right now they are in a bad spot where they either play older, less talented guys or play guys that aren't ready yet. Next year could be in a better spot as some of those guys that are a year away could be ready. Gates-Foster-Decker-Farmer-Knevel-Farniok-Wilson-Barnett-Raridon-Brokop-Gaylord-Conrad will all be redshirt freshmen or older. That should give us some more viable options.Am I right in reading chalk talk that the inside runs were the lowest producer on yards per carry, but we did that 21 times........
Great stuff as usual, unfortunately it was in a loss.
Our OL will be in the same boat next year. Little depth, less experience......I hope we plunder the juco ranks. We are going to need it.
Could be another couple years of recruiting though. I think it's going to take some time to get where we really want to be as perennial contenders.