He's busting my chops because I actually find it ridiculous to say our guys suck.you need to lighten up dude. This is big boy football. They know when they sign on the dotted line to play for nebraska that everything that happens on the field is fair game. If they suck, it is not "trashing" to say they suck.Oh...so....you are OK with trashing our players.....and coaches. Got it.Oh, I know you're serious.I'm serious. I am sick and tired of you trashing our players.Haha. Good one.No...you said we will never be as talented. You are trashing our players and I want you to stop right now. I'm tired of you trashing our players.You miss the important part of my post - these players are good enough to win if they have proper coaching.Stop trashing our players.Not transitive at all.nice...the old transitive game?
The point is, NU will not be as consistently talented across the board as the top 10 to 15 most talented rosters.
So, how do we stay consistently more successful than the other similarly talented programs while also taking a bite out of top 10 talented programs too?
In my opinion, we look at schools like Navy and Briles' Baylor (and Nebraska from the 80s and 90s) and think about modeling our system after theirs. Be hard nosed, be mobile at the QB spot, minimize opponent possessions when necessary, etc.
But some of you would rather a frontal assault against Alabama, USC and Ohio St than using an "uncool" system that might actually flank those better situated programs.
You're a funny guy.
But a reasonable assessment does indicate that the roster is in the 25 +/- 10 spots segment of team talent. That's far from sucking.
It's actually pretty much in line with NU historically, except for a few special alignments.
We have plenty of talent to win.