There is no argument that can logically justify this EO. I think that's been pretty well established here. I would like to point out that it would be foolish to hold them at their word on the 90 days.Speaking of, if you'd like to compare 81 years to 90 days... meh, I'd suggest you just find a better argument. Probably a rabbit hole there.
president snowflake does have a ring to it.He really is the most unique special snowflake there is.
They started a program in 2013 to hire 10k veterans by 2018. They are currently ahead of schedule.Maybe they should hire 10k homeless veterans instead.....just a thought
Follow up. Saw this tonight:I wondered about intent too. I assumed it wouldn't matter.
Care to fill me in on what this is about?Maybe they should hire 10k homeless veterans instead.....just a thought
https://twitter.com/blessmyliberty/status/827591900311977985
Starbucks said they would fill 10,000 jobs with refugees in response to the Executive Order. Apparently Trump supporters finally figured out how to boycott Starbucks....Care to fill me in on what this is about?Maybe they should hire 10k homeless veterans instead.....just a thought
https://twitter.com/blessmyliberty/status/827591900311977985
Ski resorts out here rely on snowflakes for business; not sure I want to alienate frozen water like that...president snowflake does have a ring to it.He really is the most unique special snowflake there is.
Will you be helping any refugees?What's fascinating to me is not that people would boycott Starbucks over that, but that they would find a way to convince themselves that this response -- angry derision over a positive commitment to help helpless refugees -- is one that deserves plaudits.