Your 3 screen shots prove there was people close to the field? I'm not following here? That's proof of what? That you can see the entire stadium?
I really didn't think you'd double down on this.
Your only knock on him is that he's at Iowa State?Jamie Pollard......good lord. That would be the equivalent of hiring MR. Nice guy who maybe could do more at a school with better support. Hard pass.
Jamie Pollard......good lord. That would be the equivalent of hiring MR. Nice guy who maybe could do more at a school with better support. Hard pass.
I think you missed the point. Jamie Pollard has hired and fired more coaches than any AD I can think of. None of which have had any notable success. The two home-runs he had promptly left after having any success (Cale Sanderson and Fred Hoiberg) which leads me to believe something stinks there. Both sports ISU has been extremely successful in and you have hometown heroes who are doing well and they bounce? Again, nice guy. But just like MR, he has no track record of proven success. Hard pass.Your only knock on him is that he's at Iowa State?
Ohio State's AD spent a stint at ISU, I'm assuming they didn't discount him simply because he live in Ames for a while.
Not an ISU thing at all. I have my doubts about Prohm, we will see. I agree Matt Campbell looks to be pretty good, but lets look at the body of work here for football.I don't get the knock on Pollard. He's done a nice job hiring coaches. Matt Campbell looks like he might turn out to be pretty solid and he made great hires in Prohm and getting Hoiberg to Ames. Is it just an ISU thing?
I was genuinely curious as to what made these two exceptional candidates? I don't see anything on their resumes that screen homerun hire, that's why I'm asking for others opinions.Why wouldn't we? Both seem like well qualified candidates to me.
Mullens seems like he might be more intriguing, but how much of Oregon is ran by Phil Knight?
Likely interacted with Tom during this time.I’m not sure, but I do believe he is head of CFP committee. That can’t hurt (not sure if that would continue or not), but it must mean he has some degree of clout and respect.
Long had a home run hire with Bobby Petrino. They were on the cusp. Then we know what happened after that. There isn't a person that follows college football that didn't think he hit another home run with Bielema. I'm a bit shocked it hasn't worked for him there. Also took our best baseball coach from us. Not that it was a hard sell, but still.I was genuinely curious as to what made these two exceptional candidates? I don't see anything on their resumes that screen homerun hire, that's why I'm asking for others opinions.
As someone pointed out Long being named head of playoff committee may be his strength. Other than that I see two AD's that have been at their schools for a good amount of time and haven't led the programs to new levels of success, at least as far as I can tell.
What makes them "qualified" for this program in your opinion?
Not an ISU thing at all. I have my doubts about Prohm, we will see. I agree Matt Campbell looks to be pretty good, but lets look at the body of work here for football.
Fires Dan McCarney to hire Gene Cheezedick who bounces after 2 years. Then hires Paul Rhoads who was abysmal. Then hire Campbell. I'm really not sold on that body of work. Some may, but Im not. Again, nice guy. But lets not pull another "he could do better with more support" hire.
Not to mention he did have Cale Sanderson and Fred Hoiberg leave him. The Sanderson one really is a head scratcher. Hoiberg makes a little more sense because he left for the pro's but still makes me wonder.