alwayshusking
Starter
Nothing to be impressed about yet. Let's see some results first.
No you look at the tape and tell me the differences you think you see. And don't tell me about X' and O's because that's not what makes a program.Watch the tape and tell me where you see any resemblance of Wisconsin, besides big white guys on the offensive line.
No you look at the tape and tell me the differences you think you see. And don't tell me about X' and O's because that's not what makes a program.
Anyone who has spent even a little time reading up on Wisconsin is immediately struck by how much of an influence we had on it. That influence being mostly from Devaney.
Alvarez couldn't get the Nebraska job, so he took what he learned form Devaney/Fry and went to a team with colors like ours and made his own little mini Nebraska. They are a poor mans version of us. Us before Bob and Tom won it big.
What makes a program is culture, and theirs is based heavily on ours. And that culture is why they succeed still to this day with programs that have triple the blue chippers they do.
Just got a new commit.So far a decommit today and no commits. I think we'll do ok this off season, but nothing special.
dag gummit...now we have to put out the fires under the tar kettles and bag up the feathers.
No, but @The Scarlet Pimpernel is right - current trends suggest you need to be an elite recruiter if you want to win a national championship. I don't think it does anybody any good to stick their feet in the dirt and suggest the recruiting rankings don't matter because they do to a degree.I think we can and should expect championships every single year. Stars dont play football.
:lol: :facepalm:
We're not talking about program culture. We were talking about the need for talent. So as it's related to what we were discussing, you're delusional (still) if you think Wisconsin resembles what Nebraska used to be on the football field.
And whether we agree or not on Nebraska/Wisconsin similarities, it isn't up for debate on whether Wisconsin is good enough to compete for National Championships. They are not. They lost to the only real team they played this season.
Wisconsin may have but teams like Wisconsin, Michigan State, ect. get exposed in playoff type competition.Wisconsin has already proved the bolded part false.
Not this argument again. People need to realize this is an unreliable metric due to small sample size and causation vs correlation.
This is your quote he's replying to:Wisconsin may have but teams like Wisconsin, Michigan State, ect. get exposed in playoff type competition.
You are aware this isn't really a debatable topic. right?
Wisconsin is the leper in that group, they last won the conference in 2012 because the top two teams in their division at the time were ineligible. Go take a look at the rankings of the teams in the playoffs and get back to this topic.
Wisconsin has won the B1G three times in the last decade; therefore, the statement "The only way we will be winning this conference multiple times in a decade is if we are consistently pulling top 15-18 recruiting classes." is provably false. I guess @Dr. Strangelove is right, not debatable.Wisconsin may have but teams like Wisconsin, Michigan State, ect. get exposed in playoff type competition.