+1,000,000I can understand where the NCAA is coming from, but using an average is what creates some of theses issues, and using grades for just about anything in education is doing things backwards. We learn by failure, but we grade on success. Doesn't make much sense. But that's a rant for a different board.
Completely agree, except I think Bradley is also worth a mention.
Not remembering Watts? Same class as Daniels, from TX. Mapieau was obviously a mistake.
Of those 9 mentioned carries, Wilbon has only 3, though obviously he hasn't had that many carries. Still, that's as many as Bryant has in 2 games. Bryant's career high, a meager 35, is also higher than Wilbon's. UCF had a lot of backs not named Killans or Anderson, and they stopped getting time because they weren't cutting it. Taj McGowan had 69 rushes, none in the final 3 games. Long run of 29. Cordarrian Richardson, 45 carries, long of 18. That's their Ozigbo and Wilbon. Also not household names. The offense creates opportunity, the back makes the plays.
By depth you mean Bell, a guy who may never play again, and a guy I feel just can't play. It's no wonder we disagree. I'm hoping Bradley surprises me, because I don't know that I would say we had legitimate depth with Washington.
Fair enough. Like I originally stated, I wasn’t trying to trip you up. I agree with you on your stance.Yeah, I guess I didn't really remember him. Go ahead and point out where I spoke decisively one way or the other on that one.
If you going to try to trip me up like this, try having an actual example or two.
Someone mentioned earlier he can practice with the team and everything. He just cant play in the games. So I think it sounds like a good deal.The Prop 48 rule sounds like a good comparison. Is he allowed any contact with the team while he's under academic redshirt?
Mavric, not trying to push buttons, but didn’t you have quite different feelings when this was happening with Riley recruits?
I am all for these situations by the way. We need to find an edge somewhere. Hopefully it pans out for us. If not, I’m not going to throw mud at Frost for trying, but it seemed like a lot of folks did at Riley.
Watts? Blades, even the kid that played DT with Snodgrass this year would qualify under the same context, right? Watts was a 4 Star. Blades was our top recruit in the past 5 years rating wise...
This is a good explanation. We are going to have to take risks like this, but we need to take them the correct way (Watts/Washington).There is a difference over signing by 3 spots on your available scholarship limit and taking a shot on an academic risk while having two other recruits at the position (JUCO Bell and Miles Jones) and undersigning by 3+ spots and having your only recruit for the position (CB Blades) be an academic risk. Watts wasn't as bad of a situation because they had D. Thomas and Daniels in the class, so they weren't putting all of their DT eggs in one academic risk basket.
Salty.Yeah, I guess I didn't really remember him. Go ahead and point out where I spoke decisively one way or the other on that one.
If you going to try to trip me up like this, try having an actual example or two.