End of Net Neutrality

[Mierin]

I don't think that has anything to do with Net Neutrality since a state can pass a law like that regardless, but I could be wrong.

Not sure now that I think about it.

Regardless, it's a bad precedent. It's porn now, but what's next? "Fake" news websites? Maybe Oklahoma makes you pay extra to access cnn.com or nytimes.com, and Connecticut does the same for conservative sites.

 

[RedDenver]

Not sure now that I think about it.

Regardless, it's a bad precedent. It's porn now, but what's next? "Fake" news websites? Maybe Oklahoma makes you pay extra to access cnn.com or nytimes.com, and Connecticut does the same for conservative sites.

I agree.

 

[Danny Bateman]

Rhode Island is essentially trying to tax porn.

I think Pai & the FCC were originally in favor of blocking state-level changes to reinstate Net Neutrality at the state level, arguing states don't have that authority. Not sure how they'd feel about this law by RI.

 

[Making Chimichangas]

I'm in favor of Net Neutrality, but what you're saying here isn't true. The government is not charging fees or deciding what's offensive.

Please reference the embedded tweets about the bill being considered in Rhode Island.

 

[Making Chimichangas]

Rhode Island is essentially trying to tax porn.

I think Pai & the FCC were originally in favor of blocking state-level changes to reinstate Net Neutrality at the state level, arguing states don't have that authority. Not sure how they'd feel about this law by RI.

To play devils advocate for a moment...

Isn't letting the states decide their own laws one of the key planks in the Republican platform?

 

[Danny Bateman]

To play devils advocate for a moment...

Isn't letting the states decide their own laws one of the key planks in the Republican platform?

Theoretically.

Until they decide to do something Republicans don't like.

 

[Making Chimichangas]

Theoretically.

Until they decide to do something Republicans don't like.

:lol:

That sounds about right.  

:lol:

 

[Mierin]

Theoretically.

Until they decide to do something Republicans don't like.

e.g. marijuana legalization, gay marriage

 

[Making Chimichangas]

Does anyone have a breakdown of votes from the Senate, regarding who for and against net neutrality? 

 

[Danny Bateman]

e.g. marijuana legalization, gay marriage

Sanctuary cities, Medicaid expansion...

 

[mrandyk]

Does anyone have a breakdown of votes from the Senate, regarding who for and against net neutrality? 

All 49 Democrats voted for it, plus Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and John Kennedy of Louisiana.

 

[Danny Bateman]

Does anyone have a breakdown of votes from the Senate, regarding who for and against net neutrality? 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/net-neutrality-vote-senate-passes-today-2018-05-16/

According to this, all of the Dems & the two independents (King & Sanders) voted yay, along with only 3 Republicans - Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins & John Kennedy.

Kennedy was pretty surprising, considering he wrote a bill to try to tank healthcare. Maine really came through (King & Collins) along with Murkowski.

 

[Making Chimichangas]

@Moiraine said: "Marijuana legalization, gay marriage."

@Clifford Franklin said: "Sanctuary cities, medicaid expansion."

I'll add: Transgender protections, raising the minimum wage.

 

[Making Chimichangas]

@mrandyk and @Clifford Franklin ... Thank you both for the info.

 

[knapplc]

[No message]