Lonestar_Husker
New member
Turn out the light. Don't try to save me.knapplc said:You may be right. I may be crazy.
But these just might be the lunatics we're looking for.
You may be wrong, for all I know, but you may be right.
Turn out the light. Don't try to save me.knapplc said:You may be right. I may be crazy.
But these just might be the lunatics we're looking for.
That’s where I got much of the info re: Lamar. Turns out he’s much tougher mentally than I ever expected.Pretty good article about Lamar Jackson and what he did post benching. This piggybacks off of what @ColoradoHusk mentioned earlier ITT.
https://www.omaha.com/huskers/football/benching-criticism-made-lamar-jackson-consider-leaving-nebraska-then-something/article_d34f66d4-1684-5fad-9186-2102f68a3257.html
Article is free to read.
Nice, Billy Joel reference :thumbsknapplc said:You may be right. I may be crazy.
But these just might be the lunatics we're looking for.
I think this is right. As far as I know there really isn’t a written codex regarding what actually constitutes being Blackshirt worthy. If the standard is the Nebraska defenses of the 90’s then we probably won’t ever see them again. But as far as I know that’s not the standard. If it was literally none of the current players probably deserve one. I think it’s a nebulous tradition that probably does more to generate message board discussion then anything else. The fact of the matter is the players and coaches who are there every day know who they can count on. My guess is that matters more then the laundryThis is mostly where I am, too; I'd probably say I'm neutral about it because I'm fairly neutral about the Blackshirts as a thing.
I think they're fun and a cool tradition, but what they mean needs to be balanced by what they are. In my opinion, a starting defensive player who handles his business off the field, practices to the best of his ability and plays to the best of his ability deserves a Blackshirt. Nothing more or less. Some players and teams have different ceilings.
In this case, if Stille feels he personally hasn't met one of those goals, I'm fine with him turning it down so long as it's not a big deal because (IMO) it shouldn't be. Bigger fish to fry, so to speak.
Maybe he means more his attitude and aggression more than actual play?I appreciate Stille's attitude but he might want to back off the Wistrom/Peter standard just a hair. If the players need to get to that level for blackshirt, we may never have one again.
Matching their attitude and aggression is maybe an even steeper hill to climb. :lol: But like I said, I appreciate that he acknowledges it takes more than a pedestrian effort. I just hope he’s not setting the bar too high for himself. He seems to get it and seems deserving of the honor.Maybe he means more his attitude and aggression more than actual play?
Yeah I gotcha, although it's better to shoot for the stars and land on the moon than to never launchMatching their attitude and aggression is maybe an even steeper hill to climb. :lol: But like I said, I appreciate that he acknowledges it takes more than a pedestrian effort. I just hope he’s not setting the bar too high for himself. He seems to get it and seems deserving of the honor.
Very true.Yeah I gotcha, although it's better to shoot for the stars and land on the moon than to never launch