Is that unfair or unrealistic, though? It doesn't seem that way to me. For something to be a double standard, we need to apply virtually the exact same parameters, limitations, qualifications, etc., to two different people/groups. We can't do that with Gebbia and Bunch so the notion that a double standard is being applied is, in my opinion, ludicrous.
I mean, let's just call a spade a spade - Bunch is a walk-on and his leaving doesn't feel like a significant loss. The Gebbia situation was a lot different. It seems like we (at least, most) agree on this. I don't think that makes anyone a hypocrite or guilty of unfairly applying a double standard. I think it's an example of people acknowledging honest disparities.
I just hate the black and white, pigeon-holing narrative some people try to employ (I'm not accusing you of this Landlord, btw, just pointing it out overall). I'm disappointed Gebbia did what he did and the tough situation it put Nebraska in, but I simultaneously understand his decision. I believe both things can be true and I can hold both opinions. I don't feel I should be obligated to choose a side.