BigRedBuster
Well-known member
Last edited by a moderator:
DOJ Initial Russia Hearings
- Thread starter NM11046
- Start date
Landlord
Banned
If they were conservative, they wouldn't say they were independent. If they were liberal, they wouldn't say they were independent. There's a middle, you know - not everyone who isn't conservative is a liberal.
How can you possibly see the world in such a childish false binary way?
MNBigRedNorth
Banned
On many things yes, because most leftist articles follow they same format and just rehash old stuff (really nothing to see). Oh and by the way I said the left needs to open their eyes. You have asked me to show how what I was say was a fact and to show some proof, with some links, yet I see none from you showing what you are saying be fact! What are your sources. That is a tough thing to do for the left today or anyone because we are a divided nation all brought on by the extremely wealthy in their attempts to control us. They have no proof and only drummed up ideas that the MSM has pound so hard that people now think they are facts. I really feel for you folk that feel for this conspiracy by Obama's people to take down President Trump. I hear that Attorney General Barr has opened an investigation into Obama now and his dealings in this whole affair and also that he has opened an investigation into the FBI agents that started this whole thing. This thing is not going to end well for the left and their Treasonous act against a sitting POTUS!
Notre Dame Joe
New member
Those are months ago. Dersh claimed CNN stopped having him on because he told them unpleasant legal truths such as "exercising due powers cannot be obstruction of justice." If CNN has a denial Ill listen.
Are you saying you go directly to the AP wire or read their articles through a normal medium?
PRetty much every media outlet uses AP stories.
Self described independents tend to be quite partisan. it was on NPR
RedDenver
Active member
The first and last articles show that Wallace and Baier are registered Democrat and Independent, respectively. The second "article" is just a website of random people on the internet answering questions.
So of the 3, you've shown Wallace is a registered Democrat (if you read the article you'll see it's for practicality reasons), Baier isn't a Democrat, and you have no evidence that Smith is a Democrat and no evidence that any of the 3 are liberal. But thanks for giving it a try.
Landlord
Banned
Self described independents tend to be quite partisan. it was on NPR
Most human beings gravitate into a tribe, sure. Most human beings are also capable of comprehending that there is a middle of a spectrum - something @MNBigRedNorth hasn't shown the ability to do.
MNBigRedNorth
Banned
I'll reply with this article: Now you have to read it. No matter what you say there are facts in it and some common sense. The video is of testimony today by AG Barr in congress from PBS!
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/04/10/ag-william-barr-yes-i-think-spying-did-occur-on-trump-campaign-video-and-transcript/
MNBigRedNorth
Banned
Well just like a true leftist you take your opinion and run with it. They are all liberal to me no matter what. So our opinions don't match, WOW!!! Why don't you prove with evidence that they are what you say they are. Heck your the one worried about it not me!
MNBigRedNorth
Banned
Talk about tribal!! You might want to look in the mirror! :laughpound :laughpound :laughpound :laughpound
MNBigRedNorth
Banned
:thumbsThose are months ago. Dersh claimed CNN stopped having him on because he told them unpleasant legal truths such as "exercising due powers cannot be obstruction of justice." If CNN has a denial Ill listen.
Are you saying you go directly to the AP wire or read their articles through a normal medium?
PRetty much every media outlet uses AP stories.
Self described independents tend to be quite partisan. it was on NPR
BigRedBuster
Well-known member
OMG...The FEAR.
Meanwhile, I would like you to read my article and point out where you think the lies are that you constantly allude to? Where is it liberal propaganda?
MNBigRedNorth
Banned
He falsely claimed that the Mueller report had found “no obstruction.” While the four-page letter released by Barr said the special counsel did not find a criminal conspiracy between Russia and Trump associates around the time of the 2016 election, it also said Mueller had presented evidence on both sides of the obstruction question and ultimately did not reach a conclusion on it.
This paragraph from the article is pure opinion from my point of view, since it is impossible for a sitting POTUS any POTUS even Obama to commit obstruction. He is the ultimate authority and can stop any investigation. Also if Mueller couldn't reach a conclusion, it's not to say that obstruction could be done by a POTUS. Mueller did that specifically to allow the left some bait to say there might be obstruction. We will soon see the report and that little tidbit will go up in smoke too! That paragraph is junk, other than that the article was fine. Mueller must have been just fine with what Barr reported in those four pages, or he would have been in the press complaining by now and there isn't an MSM outlet that wouldn't report it. Just more dreaming! Hey I'm out here until tomorrow! Later!
Last edited by a moderator:
Notre Dame Joe
New member
Barr asked Mueller to comment on the 4 page summary. Mueller declined to do so. If Mueller thinks his boss is misconstruing his report then Bob has a duty to resign yesterday and go public.
But he won't. Thats why I still predict Bob will testify before Congress and try to straddle the fence with his "cannot conclude" mishmash.
