F
Fru
Guest
If that happens, would that compromise anything with the other investigations that were farmed out?
DOJ Initial Russia Hearings
- Thread starter NM11046
- Start date
If that happens, would that compromise anything with the other investigations that were farmed out?
MNBigRedNorth
Banned
Time to put this thread to bed! Mueller Blockade is now over. Fake investigations by committee members will not delay what is about to be unleashed. Spying on a sitting POTUS is now on full on! Jail Bar Barr will eventually get to the bottom of this corruption of first spying on a campaign and then on a sitting POTUS!
Last edited by a moderator:
schriznoeder
New member
Wow...
RedDenver
Active member
I'd like to know where his facts are! They do matter!
Your inability to comment on the facts is noted.
MNBigRedNorth
Banned
RedDenver
Active member
I did, I am, and I will. Care to venture into the land of logic and facts and discuss the report?
MNBigRedNorth
Banned
Not really. The report speaks for itself and there is no collusion and NO OBSTRUCTION. Get over it! We all need to move on! Don't even ask me to discuss. There is nothing to discus! This is my last post in this dead thread, since it is all over!
commando
New member
BigRedBuster
Well-known member
F
Fru
Guest
You're right. The report does speak for itself.
Maybe pay particular attention to the part that says "If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment."
Last edited:
commando
New member
reading comprehension seems to be lacking with the maga hat crowd.
You're right. The report does speak for itself.
Maybe pay particular attention to the part that says "If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment."
RedDenver
Active member
The report does indeed speak for itself and that isn't what it says. But I appreciate your honesty in acknowledging you don't want to have a logical or factual discussion.
BigRedBuster
Well-known member
[No message]
Nebfanatic
New member
The report does speak for itself, so try reading it yourself instead of parroting the White Houses version. If the report speaks for itself why are they spinning it so hard??