Even Riley? I'm trying to be neutral here but its really tough to justify that hiring, both at the time and in hindsight. 30 year coach with a .500 record and his claim to fame is he's niceI was against nearly every firing. Mostly because I thought we could "fix" the fault(s) of each coach. I guess I'm one of those guys who thinks it's easier to fix something than to burn it down and start over.
That said, even though I opposed the firings, I liked each coaching hire we ended up making.
Even Riley? I'm trying to be neutral here but its really tough to justify that hiring, both at the time and in hindsight. 30 year coach with a .500 record and his claim to fame is he's nice
I didn’t think Riley was the answer but eichorst and pearlman really inserted themselves where they didn’t belong. Forcing the diaco hiring when banker had shown good improvement yoy was mind boggling.Even Riley? I'm trying to be neutral here but its really tough to justify that hiring, both at the time and in hindsight. 30 year coach with a .500 record and his claim to fame is he's nice
I agree - probably the worse coach hire that I can think of for any blue blood program. It really was an underestimation of our program potential to hire such an underwhelming coach. Granted he was the 'anti-Bo' but there were probably a lot of anti-Bo candidates who were more qualified.Even Riley? I'm trying to be neutral here but its really tough to justify that hiring, both at the time and in hindsight. 30 year coach with a .500 record and his claim to fame is he's nice
It actually cost the taxpayers zero dollars. The football program is self sustaining, even carrying water for all but 3-4 other sports teams at Nebraska. Men’s bb, I believe men’s baseball, and the volleyball team was just added a yr or two ago carry their own. Not only that but the football revenue actually gives back to the university in a form of an academic scholarship or at least did at one time. Again, ZERO public funding or taxpayer dollars. Academic and athletic departments are managed 100% separately.Yeah, even Riley. Don't get me wrong. I thought Scott Frost would be a great hire. But I thought Riley could be fixed.
Instead of paying SF's rather large salary plus Riley's buyout we could have spent an extra $1.5 million on each side of the ball to hire the best offensive and defensive coordinators and assistant coaches that money can buy. We would have gotten a top OC and DC for that kind of coin.
Riley was fairly low paid for a Power Five head coach. We were paying him $2.9 million. Riley could have taken the lead in recruiting and media relations as a CEO type coach. And we could have afforded a very high paid staff of assistants to do the coaching.
But instead we're paying Riley buyout money which costs the taxpayers of Nebraska a small fortune and does our program absolutely zero good.
/jmho
As for football, thanks Shawn Eichorst!! Ya really outdid yourself, you should be the one accepting this trophy on behalf of us all
In addition to the last point from @N is for nowledgeYeah, even Riley. Don't get me wrong. I thought Scott Frost would be a great hire. But I thought Riley could be fixed.
Instead of paying SF's rather large salary plus Riley's buyout we could have spent an extra $1.5 million on each side of the ball to hire the best offensive and defensive coordinators and assistant coaches that money can buy. We would have gotten a top OC and DC for that kind of coin.
Riley was fairly low paid for a Power Five head coach. We were paying him $2.9 million. Riley could have taken the lead in recruiting and media relations as a CEO type coach. And we could have afforded a very high paid staff of assistants to do the coaching.
But instead we're paying Riley buyout money which costs the taxpayers of Nebraska a small fortune and does our program absolutely zero good.
/jmho
Meh, no one cares about men's hoops anyways outside of 3.5 weeks in march and april.
No....the money doesn't come from tax payers.But instead we're paying Riley buyout money which costs the taxpayers of Nebraska a small fortune and does our program absolutely zero good.
I agree. I was excited about all the hires (yes, even Riley, but admittedly less than the others). I backed every single one of them till about half way through each of their final year's. Each one needed to go when they were fired.Yeah, even Riley. Don't get me wrong. I thought Scott Frost would be a great hire. But I thought Riley could be fixed.
Instead of paying SF's rather large salary plus Riley's buyout we could have spent an extra $1.5 million on each side of the ball to hire the best offensive and defensive coordinators and assistant coaches that money can buy. We would have gotten a top OC and DC for that kind of coin.
Riley was fairly low paid for a Power Five head coach. We were paying him $2.9 million. Riley could have taken the lead in recruiting and media relations as a CEO type coach. And we could have afforded a very high paid staff of assistants to do the coaching.