Incident #1 was NOT reported
Incident #2 ws a butt grab. I am not saying that is right by any means, but it's hard to punish someone on this right?
Incident #3 was a rape reported case where Hunt and Legrone were kicked off the team
What more could have been done?
It sounds easy sitting in your desk chair right now. I have seen many many times it is hard to convict someone if the people who were said to have done it say they didn't. He said vs she said...I assume it was looked into. If not, then whoever is supposed to look further needs to see the door.It's not hard to punish someone on this; it's sexual assault.
It sounds easy sitting in your desk chair right now. I have seen many many times it is hard to convict someone if the people who were said to have done it say they didn't. He said vs she said...I assume it was looked into. If not, then whoever is supposed to look further needs to see the door.
He said vs she said...I assume it was looked into. If not, then whoever is supposed to look further needs to see the door.
Incident #1 was NOT reported
Incident #2 ws a butt grab. I am not saying that is right by any means, but it's hard to punish someone on this right?
Incident #3 was a rape reported case where Hunt and Legrone were kicked off the team
What more could have been done?
This. I think everyone agrees it is wrong, but people who act like every time someone is accused needs to be kicked off the team is delusional. You have to prove things. Look at Cephus from Wisconsin.There are a lot of ways to deal with a butt grab that don't involve public knowledge or being kicked off the team. Being benched for a game, pencil rolls every day after practice for a month, running stairs for a month, etc.
I supposed it also depends on the severity. If it's just a pinch on the butt, or a slap, maybe run stairs. If it's full on groping, we're talking more severe penalties.
The football program and the university all have compliance people out the wazoo. There is no way the football team is going to remove players based on sexual misconduct allegations without consulting with the Title IX office and UNL administration. If the football program takes action on a university (and federal) policy without due process, it is the football program who gets sued. 100% guarantee that the removal of the players was coordinated with a Title IX investigation.Was it UNL that took these actions, or the football program? From everything I've read, Hunt and LeGrone were removed from the team as soon as the staff found out about the allegations, and from everything I'm reading here and until we know more, this seems more like a University issue than a program issue. Regardless of what is true, I'm deeply embarrassed of my alma mater this morning.
That's why the court of public opinion can be so dangerous. Assumptions and aspersions begin to fly any time someone names alleged victims and alleged perpetrators, particularly in cases of sexual assault. There's even evidence of this behavior in this thread.This. I think everyone agrees it is wrong, but people who act like every time someone is accused needs to be kicked off the team is delusional.
It's not hard to punish someone on this; it's sexual assault.
The football program and the university all have compliance people out the wazoo. There is no way the football team is going to remove players based on sexual misconduct allegations without consulting with the Title IX office and UNL administration. If the football program takes action on a university (and federal) policy without due process, it is the football program who gets sued. 100% guarantee that the removal of the players was coordinated with a Title IX investigation.