That’s why I would think it would be a state by state decision. However I could see some unfair advantage claims by teams that cannot resume normal activities. Maybe individual conferences can equalize revenue among teams?Something to remember is that different areas are in different stages. Overall nationwide, the daily death toll has been slowly declining since mid-April. But in Iowa, for example, daily deaths have been slowly but steadily rising since March.
I made no accusation, but just stated a fact and asked a question. I stand by my post stating that what you posted was not backed by evidence or official recommendations. It was your opinions and/or estimations. That's fine, but it doesn't mean I was wrong with what I said.Before making accusations you should at a minimum do a little homework. Here is evidence for you straight off the Nebraska statewide Covid Page ( http://dhhs.ne.gov/Pages/Coronavirus.aspx )
According to their numbers, 37.9% of all positive cases were in people age 34 and under. That is currently 5,634 younger people who have had the virus. Out of those, 3 died. That works out to .053%. The same site also shows that 1.33% of those became sick enough to require hospitalization. Keep in mind this is the age group least likely to even show symptoms or be tested. It is safe to assume that the positive number for this age class is well above the numbers reported making the percentages fall even lower.
Now if you take a group of athletes in this age class, in the best shape of their lives, and you test them daily, don't you think them playing football together is a hell of a lot safer than your neighborhood grocery store? I would also say the coaches and staff around them are also a lot safer being with a group tested regularly than they are at your average backyard BBQ.
Fans should get to choose. Have them sign a waiver walking in and let each individual be responsible for their own health.
How many college sports have been played since the pandemic hit us? I honestly don’t know, but I would imagine that number is close to zero as well.How many college athletes have been infected in sports or college activities! Almost zero are known.
its not the sport activities -imo- that increase the risk. its away from sports. Cant be much risk interacting, closely, with other athletes when everyone tests negative before competing.How many college sports have been played since the pandemic hit us? I honestly don’t know, but I would imagine that number is close to zero as well.
Not sure I understand about the 14% death rate statistic. The difference between 86% and 100%, is not the death rate—it’s the recovered rate+the actively sick rate+the death rate. At least that’s my understanding. Maybe I misunderstoodThere are about 800,000 closed COVID-19 cases in the U.S.
86% of the patients recovered and were discharged, 14% died. That 14% is a pretty high number. We know it skews towards the elderly and folks with compromised conditions, including asthma and as it turns out, obesity. For reasons still unclear blacks and latinos are disproportionately affected, perhaps relating to lower incomes and the poor diets and healthcare that come with it. Healthy young athletes no doubt pull a much smaller percentage. But where does the 300 pound African-American lineman stand? Or the 70 year old trainer? Our high school quarterback dropped dead at 19 from a condition he didn't know he had, because he was a 19 year old athlete and nobody thought to give him a heart scan.
But let's say you get that number down to a 3% fatality rate. That seems low. But as someone explained it to me: imagine putting 100 Skittles into a bowl and knowing that 3 of those Skittles will kill you. How many Skittles would you be willing to eat?
Not sure I understand about the 14% death rate statistic. The difference between 86% and 100%, is not the death rate—it’s the recovered rate+the actively sick rate+the death rate. At least that’s my understanding. Maybe I misunderstood
I don’t know where you are getting your data but here is the latest as of 1 minute ago. 1.9 million cases in US with 110,000 deaths. 5.7% with worldwide cases 6.4 million with 383,000 deaths 5.9%. Plus like most experts believe due to lack of testing and large numbers of people who get no symptoms the death rate is really closer to 1% or less. Man I see why there are paranoid folks if they believe 14% death rateIt's pulled from the 800,000 U.S. COVID cases that have reached a resolution — not including still active cases (another 1.1 million). Those people contracted COVID and 86% officially recovered while 14% died.
Now we're waiting to see if the numbers for the remaining 1.1 million active cases will change, and early indications suggest the death rate is dropping.
Globally, the numbers are fairly similar: among closed cases, 89% recovered, 11% died.
Guy is comparing the number of deaths against the resolved cases only, not total cases. You’re both using the same numbers. I guess you’re either recovered or dead.I don’t know where you are getting your data but here is the latest as of 1 minute ago. 1.9 million cases in US with 110,000 deaths. 5.7% with worldwide cases 6.4 million with 383,000 deaths 5.9%. Plus like most experts believe due to lack of testing and large numbers of people who get no symptoms the death rate is really closer to 1% or less. Man I see why there are paranoid folks if they believe 14% death rate
Nope. No season this fall. College team sports will be reduced to Football, basketball and baseball. Other sports will become extinct. The second round of COVID 19 will hit this fall. Schools will remain closed. No football will be played for 3-5 years, during which, Iowa will claim 3 championships. It is a bleak, bleak time indeed.