WyoHusker56
Starter
There's a max capacity of 100 attendees in the session. I couldn't get in, and i'm guessing that "room" has been full since it was announced.
Same.
Anyone know if live video is available?
The live link is full.
There's a max capacity of 100 attendees in the session. I couldn't get in, and i'm guessing that "room" has been full since it was announced.
Anyone know if live video is available?
So the Big Ten has an attorney in Lancaster County, on retainer, ready to represent their position in response to this suit, today?
That seems unlikely.
That case is often brought up as a laughable example of dumb lawsuits, but it was a legitimate (and interesting) case.Let me give you an example why anything is possible with our joke of a legal system.
Once upon a time someone went to a restaurant- they ordered a hot coffee. They spilled the hot coffee on themselves. They brought a lawsuit against the restaurant for giving them coffee that was too hot. The restaurant was penalized 2.86 million for selling hot coffee.
Agreed, might open the door to a lot of hidden conversations that the Big Ten has had in the past but intended to stay private. Could also be as simple as they don't want to have their authority questioned at any point.Now I am really intrigued. What are they hiding that would cause incredible harm if released.
Preach it. A lot of these folk are giving off an arrogance that they are above being questioned. Unfortunately for them, a lot of their donors support their university based on how the school represents themselves. This whole deal has looked ugly for quite a few of the schools in the conference and their top brass.The thing these presidents/chancellors/council/commissioner don't seem to get is a lot of this scrutiny never happens if they just would have been transparent from the start. Here's our reasoning, here are the studies, here's the vote. Any questions? Ok, looking forward to the future.
They've brought this all on themselves.
The thing these presidents/chancellors/council/commissioner don't seem to get is a lot of this scrutiny never happens if they just would have been transparent from the start. Here's our reasoning, here are the studies, here's the vote. Any questions? Ok, looking forward to the future.
They've brought this all on themselves.