Huskers93-97
New member
Some say 12 is too many. Until the day when Nebraska is the 12th team and gets a crack at the Natty. Imagine 2009 Nebraska with Suh sneaking into a playoff. Who knows what could have happened. Being hot at the right time.
Almost every year in the 1980s was a one play or in the case of 1982, 2 feet out of bounds, (or one finger tip in 83) that kept us from the top.12 is too many.
8 is probably where it goes, and that's okay. I'd kinda like to see 6.
Regardless of how many there are, the first team left out will always be upset, whether they are #5, #7, #9, or #13. I guess you ask yourself at what point should someone get a shot at it?
Sure wish we'd had this in the 80s. Wouldn't it have been nice to have a second crack at Oklahoma a couple times?
80’s....Oklahoma......with Keith Jackson (who seemingly played for them for all ten years of the 80’s)? No thanks. More games against them might actually have succeeded in running off TO.44 minutes ago, CheeseHusker said:
Sure wish we'd had this in the 80s. Wouldn't it have been nice to have a second crack at Oklahoma a couple times?
Some say 12 is too many. Until the day when Nebraska is the 12th team and gets a crack at the Natty. Imagine 2009 Nebraska with Suh sneaking into a playoff. Who knows what could have happened. Being hot at the right time.
I used to be onboard with this setup too, but now I struggle with the GO5 getting an automatic bid. Maybe a stipulation that the auto bid would be only if the GO5 champ was undefeated, ala UCF 2017.I already fixed this a long time ago.
8 teams
5 Power 5 champs get in automatically
2 at large teams selected by comittee
1 group of 5 champ selected by committee
I used to be onboard with this setup too, but now I struggle with the GO5 getting an automatic bid. Maybe a stipulation that the auto bid would be only if the GO5 champ was undefeated, ala UCF 2017.