Like I said, it's comical that you're letting the results of a few meaningless basketball games cloud your judgement of a guy who has consistently show his greatness, on the offensive side of the game, throughout his career.
None of what has happened in the past couple weeks changes my argument at all, so it doesn't suck at all. The Warriors of Curry, Klay, Durant, and Green would beat the Bulls. I still find that to be true. Also, like I mentioned, I can't stand KD. I root against him consistently, but pretending (which is what you're doing) that he isn't one of the best scorers of all time, and that he wouldn't cause the Bulls all kinds of fits, is ridiculously hilarious. Those Warriors teams have two guys (Curry, Durant) that are unlike anything those Bulls teams ever seen. Jordan was fantastic, and would obviously be able to play right with, or outplay the Warriors trio, individually. But the rest of that team would be completely overwhelmed.
A good way to look at it would be to take off the best player from each team (Jordan and Durant). Do you still think the Bulls would win that series? Of course not. The Warriors (still having Curry and Thompson) would almost certainly sweep them. Now, add back in Jordan and Durant.... Jordan could probably get them a couple, but he wouldn't flip that series.
You guys can't be clutching onto your heros like this into your 30s and 40s. It's not healthy. I get it though. I like to believe that the 95 Huskers would beat that Alabama team from last year, when that Alabama team would probably drub them by 14+. It's a hard pill to take.
As you said, it doesn't matter. It's a match up we'll never see get played. :dunno
