Made up your mind or waiting to see?

Have you already decided that staff changes are necessary or are you waiting to see the results of t

  • Frost & staff need to go, regardless of the results of the next 4

    Votes: 18 19.6%

  • Frost & staff need to be evaluated at the end of the season

    Votes: 49 53.3%

  • Frost & staff need one more year no matter what

    Votes: 19 20.7%

  • Other - explain below

    Votes: 6 6.5%
  • Total voters
    92
Guy Chamberlin said:
It's a pretty big spectrum. Everyone wants - or wanted - Frost to succeed. But the negative stuff isn't exactly trolling, either. Frost's comparison to his coaching peers is sobering, and the Hot Seat speculation comes with every HC job worth having. Nebraska fans, donors, and administrators are hardly alone in their concern. 

So my mind is made up and I'm waiting to see at the same time. 

Two wins and two hard fought losses and we have a template for moving forward.

Keep finding new ways to lose and I think we have a coaching staff that is letting the players down, not the other way around. 

But that's why they play the games. I'll be watching and rooting for the Huskers like always. 
Click to expand...
I would agree.  Definitely not trolling but that dead horse is receiving one hell of a beating this bye week.  If we don't get to 6 wins, I'll offer a few kicks of my own.

 
Hilltop said:
I would agree.  Definitely not trolling but that dead horse is receiving one hell of a beating this bye week.  If we don't get to 6 wins, I'll offer a few kicks of my own.
Click to expand...
dedhoarse   Here - I thought you'd like to practice. 

 
I should also note that what I think should happen and what I think Alberts will actually do are very different things...

 
TheSker said:
You can probably find a post or 10 on this site if you look back at how "meaningless" those 9 win seasons were......
Click to expand...
oh I wasnt happy with the losses then. I am never happy with losses but I would gladly and would all of you s#!tty losses against the top 10 teams we have played this year in exchange for beating teams like Illinois, Minnesota etc. We are much more meaningless now than we have been since before Devaney. 

 
Ulty said:
No it wasn't.

The Illinois game was the same $h!t we saw in the previous 3 seasons, and it is the same $h!t we have seen in the past two months. Sometimes these performances have been against top 10 teams, sometimes they have been against crap teams. But we always find new ways to make dumb mistakes and we never close the deal. We've lost more games in this exact manner than we have won in any manner. And every time we find ourselves in a "must win game" or "the most important game of Frost's career" or "chance to make a big statement," we fail. Every. Damn. Time. 

The Illinois game is not a head scratcher, it is the norm. In fact, the Illinois game is the quintessential Scott Frost coached game at Nebraska.
Click to expand...
You beat me to a response as that too was my reaction to the post.  Those supporting this staff continue to treat these mounting losses as an aberration when in point of fact they are part of an established trend.

Illinois was not a head scratcher as we had an entire offseason to gameplan and prepare for what I described this Spring as a near "must win" for the staff.  Rare for an opening game, but it is proving to be true.

Similarly, Minnesota is in the same bucket.  For those that tout the near misses against Top Ten teams such as OU, MSU, and OU, as a sign of progress, there is a palpable silence when it comes to losing the winnable games that matter for bowl eligibility.  

 
Hedley Lamarr said:
oh I wasnt happy with the losses then. I am never happy with losses but I would gladly and would all of you s#!tty losses against the top 10 teams we have played this year in exchange for beating teams like Illinois, Minnesota etc. We are much more meaningless now than we have been since before Devaney. 
Click to expand...
I think the only thing worse than being 3-5, are the people trying to convince me it's not bad. 

 
FrantzHardySwag said:
I think the only thing worse than being 3-5, are the people trying to convince me it's not bad. 
Click to expand...
Exactly, trying to compare a coach that has only beat 1 P5 team this year to Pelini who went to multiple conference championships always won 9 games etc. How many years did Bo only beat 1 P5 team after 8 games? 

 
Hedley Lamarr said:
Exactly, trying to compare a coach that has only beat 1 P5 team this year to Pelini who went to multiple conference championships always won 9 games etc. How many years did Bo only beat 1 P5 team after 8 games? 
Click to expand...
You'll have to take the Pelini thing up with Perlman.

I was for keeping Pelini.

But many many downplayed the wins and focused on the blowouts.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Please look below and tell me which is the more meaningless in college football. Take any 2 of Bo's worst years and he won more or the same as Frost in both total wins as well as conference wins in 4 years. 

Bo Pelini






2008


Nebraska


9–4


5–3


T–1st (North)


W Gator


 


 




2009


Nebraska


10–4


6–2


1st (North)


W Holiday


14


14




2010


Nebraska


10–4


6–2


T–1st (North)


L Holiday


19


20




Nebraska Cornhuskers (Big Ten Conference) (2011–2014)




2011


Nebraska


9–4


5–3


3rd (Legends)


L Capital One


24


24




2012


Nebraska


10–4


7–1


1st (Legends)


L Capital One


23


25




2013


Nebraska


9–4


5–3


T–2nd (Legends)


W Gator


25


 




2014


Nebraska


9–3[n 2]


5–3


T–2nd (West)


Holiday[n 2]


23


25




Nebraska:


67–27


39–17







Scott Frost






2018


Nebraska


4–8


3–6


T–5th (West)


 


 


 




2019


Nebraska


5–7


3–6


T–5th (West)


 


 


 




2020


Nebraska


3–5


3–5


5th (West)


 


 


 




2021


Nebraska


3–5


1–4


(West)


 


 


 




Nebraska:


15–25


10–21




 
Hedley Lamarr said:
Please look below and tell me which is the more meaningless in college football. Take any 2 of Bo's worst years and he won more or the same as Frost in both total wins as well as conference wins in 4 years. 

Bo Pelini





2008


Nebraska


9–4


5–3


T–1st (North)


W Gator


 


 




2009


Nebraska


10–4


6–2


1st (North)


W Holiday


14


14




2010


Nebraska


10–4


6–2


T–1st (North)


L Holiday


19


20




Nebraska Cornhuskers (Big Ten Conference) (2011–2014)




2011


Nebraska


9–4


5–3


3rd (Legends)


L Capital One


24


24




2012


Nebraska


10–4


7–1


1st (Legends)


L Capital One


23


25




2013


Nebraska


9–4


5–3


T–2nd (Legends)


W Gator


25


 




2014


Nebraska


9–3[n 2]


5–3


T–2nd (West)


Holiday[n 2]


23


25




Nebraska:


67–27


39–17







Scott Frost





2018


Nebraska


4–8


3–6


T–5th (West)


 


 


 




2019


Nebraska


5–7


3–6


T–5th (West)


 


 


 




2020


Nebraska


3–5


3–5


5th (West)


 


 


 




2021


Nebraska


3–5


1–4


(West)


 


 


 




Nebraska:


15–25


10–21
Click to expand...
I dont see moral victories factored in anywhere.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top