IncorrectThat's some CRAZY money to throw at guys....We don't have those resources.....
IncorrectThat's some CRAZY money to throw at guys....We don't have those resources.....
But wait, but wait ... I thought it was all just a "cost of doing business"? Ha ha.Mel Tucker has a career record of 16-13 as a head coach. Nine of those wins came this year.
Two of those wins are against Nebraska.
I don't care who has how much money, giving that guy that amount of money is insane.
If Tucker is there in the next five years, great. But if not they're giving tens of millions of guaranteed money to a coach who had one good year.
Sound familiar?
The why didn't we spend them this year? To get a coach like Riley (if rumors are true) we spend upwards of 90+ million in addition to another 20 million in dead money. Hell, even a 16-13 Mel Tucker gets 90+.....We might "have the resources", but it is evident in our current situation that those with the purse strings are trying to save the money. I think we are also tired of throwing good money after bad with Bo and Riley and now possibly Frost at some point. VT on the other hand had enough of Fuentes and wanted to just get a leg up on the searching.Incorrect
To the post, if the info is accurate, we do and would spend the resources. And I was wrong in my assumption that we wouldn't/couldn't pay.A little bird told me that Frost was also supposed to get canned that Monday but Trev went against the boosters....
It was all set up to have Matt Campbell come in.
That would mean that Nebraska would pay Campbell's 28 M buyout, at the time Frost 20 M buyout, as well as the previous coaching staff and Campbell's new staff's salary it would be in the neighbourhood of 50-60 M. On top of a already behind scheduled 150 M dollar facilities upgrade.
If true that would put Nebraska around 200 M in dedicated money just to the football team over the coarse of 2-4 years. I would say that Nebraska is serious about making the necessary changes that need to be made.
Not gonna lie, unless we get a home run OC and staff, unsure how next year is any different. I watched Louisville vs Duke last night saw Cutcliffe (77-95) and thought of Frost and his 4 year record......not holding out hope that in year 5+ he catches lightning in a bottle.Everything I am hearing is that the boosters are "Fed up" and Frost still might not be safe this year
I can't imagion the high brow billionaire slant comments that the big boys throw at each-other.
The is where I am at, I don't know what Frost can do other than win a lot of games next year to prove that we are headed in the right direction. I mean 10 win season type stuff. But then either AM returns and we know what we have there, or we are breaking in a new QB who for right now is on the roster, but who is to say they don't transfer... GAH!Not gonna lie, unless we get a home run OC and staff, unsure how next year is any different. I watched Louisville vs Duke last night saw Cutcliffe (77-95) and thought of Frost and his 4 year record......not holding out hope that in year 5+ he catches lightning in a bottle.
Trev went against "the boosters"A little bird told me that Frost was also supposed to get canned that Monday but Trev went against the boosters....
It was all set up to have Matt Campbell come in.
That would mean that Nebraska would pay Campbell's 28 M buyout, at the time Frost 20 M buyout, as well as the previous coaching staff and Campbell's new staff's salary it would be in the neighbourhood of 50-60 M. On top of a already behind scheduled 150 M dollar facilities upgrade.
If true that would put Nebraska around 200 M in dedicated money just to the football team over the coarse of 2-4 years. I would say that Nebraska is serious about making the necessary changes that need to be made.
Take it for what it is worth, I don't think it was a unanimous decision by all booster or backers whatever you would like to call them.Trev went against "the boosters"
.....while fundraising for the new facility.
Ok