Huskerfollower4life
Active member
Decked I hope you didn't poop your pants again with Washington addition!!! :lol:
If Casey didn't have the injury last year, he probably wouldn't have even gone in the portal. As far as the other rankings, I have no clue and don't really care. As long as our staff feels they will help us win, I'll take 2 star kids.I can understand why they downgraded Palmer and certain players but I don't agree with downgrading Thompson. I think he should be ranked higher with the season and injury he had. I don't understand why people aren't ranking Casey Thompson higher. If he didn't play with a thumb injury all season he probably would have had more team and individual success and his stats weren't bad but they didn't tell the full story.
If Casey didn't have the injury last year, he probably wouldn't have even gone in the portal. As far as the other rankings, I have no clue and don't really care. As long as our staff feels they will help us win, I'll take 2 star kids.
I definitely agree and should have clarified - If he wasn't injured, he likely has a pretty great season and ends up at a school that didn't go 3-9 last year if he choose to go in.This is definitely possible but also seemed like Sark did not want to start him the whole time for whatever reason. I remember watching the Arkansas game and thinking this backup looks like the better QB. Also heard Texas fans saying there was a lot of rumblings that the players wanted Casey to start. So there may have been just something with him that didnt mesh with what Sark wanted to do.
That's my believe too. That Casey was a better QB then Hudson Card but the coach never fully was committed to him and neither is the media bc look how they look at him a 3 star transfer in return he lead the big 12 in touchdowns with his injury. It wasn't Casey fault that Texas did so poorly team success. But Sark went a different direction bc he saw that he had a losing season so he brought in the QB from Ohio State Ewers who is ranked a 5 star portal transfer even though he hasn't played a lick of college football. Casey didn't get a fair shake regardless of his injury last season.This is definitely possible but also seemed like Sark did not want to start him the whole time for whatever reason. I remember watching the Arkansas game and thinking this backup looks like the better QB. Also heard Texas fans saying there was a lot of rumblings that the players wanted Casey to start. So there may have been just something with him that didnt mesh with what Sark wanted to do.
Ah ok yes I probably agree with this although I do think out NIL money combined with Whipple just coaching the Heisman winner did give us some clout despite our poor showing. But yeah if he hadnt been injured and he puts up around 3000 yds and 30 or more TDs in only like 10 games then he would have his pick of a lot more schools.I definitely agree and should have clarified - If he wasn't injured, he likely has a pretty great season and ends up at a school that didn't go 3-9 last year if he choose to go in.
Yeah I'm not sure exactly what they base the stars on because I would think Palmer and Thompson should be 4 stars. Like you said its definitely not based on on-field success if Ewers is a 5 star.That's my believe too. That Casey was a better QB then Hudson Card but the coach never fully was committed to him and neither is the media bc look how they look at him a 3 star transfer in return he lead the big 12 in touchdowns with his injury. It wasn't Casey fault that Texas did so poorly team success. But Sark went a different direction bc he saw that he had a losing season so he brought in the QB from Ohio State Ewers who is ranked a 5 star portal transfer even though he hasn't played a lick of college football. Casey didn't get a fair shake regardless of his injury last season.
Culp to USC and they drop out of the top 20Average would look a lot better if we didn’t have a K/P in this class