Good read. It's what I mentioned earlier about Oregon and Washington not bringing in enough money to the big10....yet.
"Oregon and Washington are the two best football programs "in play" considering the Pac-12 is down to 10 teams; however, there is a reason they haven't been considered prominently in realignment. Industry sources say neither brings requisite value to the Big Ten ($80 million-$100 million per year)."
"One industry source called Oregon and Washington "tweeners" in realignment."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/conference-realignment-phil-knight-resorts-to-cold-calling-for-oregon-as-pac-12-big-12-acc-seek-lifelines/amp/
"Oregon and Washington are the two best football programs "in play" considering the Pac-12 is down to 10 teams; however, there is a reason they haven't been considered prominently in realignment. Industry sources say neither brings requisite value to the Big Ten ($80 million-$100 million per year)."
"One industry source called Oregon and Washington "tweeners" in realignment."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/conference-realignment-phil-knight-resorts-to-cold-calling-for-oregon-as-pac-12-big-12-acc-seek-lifelines/amp/
Last edited by a moderator: