DefenderAO
All-Conference
I want to fiet that guy
I agree with this 100%. I would argue that at 3-9, we weren't "close" to anything other than maybe 4-8 or at best 5-7. We were who we were. A team that couldn't get out of it's own way every single time when we weren't playing a bad team.A season of close losses stemming from mental mistakes usually means they very good talent was coached poorly.
That leaves coaching and culture and some solid portal pick-ups. Which may have been addressed this off-season. We'll see.
Very well said, Guy. I might only qualify the overall talent comparisons that the general level of talent is somewhat variable. I tend to believe our RBs and receivers actually had more raw talent than most teams we’ve played. I don’t mean we had the best at any spot but we have had more the enough to win 8-8 games. But there have been positions like O line and QB where raw talent was below par. Adrian was, imo, not nearly as good as many gave him credit for. Apparently, Frost couldn’t find a capable 2nd or 3rd string QB so he played a gimpy, hobbled and wounded AM. The offense has not been very good in some respects. Raw stats don’t meet up with the ‘eye test’ imo.Last season was helpful for breaking the fallacy that the Huskers simply faced a talent gap.
We held our own against everyone else in the Big 10, never looking over-powered. Well, except for Illinois.
Knowing we were "close" on talent should mean we are not multiple recruiting classes away from relevance.
That leaves coaching and culture and some solid portal pick-ups. Which may have been addressed this off-season. We'll see.
Didn't read the article itself. I think most of us are already ahead of Feit's headline.