I think the reality is Frost and Co were not ready to the HC at a major program. Yes, he captured lightning in a bottle in year two at UCF, but he did not exactly inherit a team devoid of talent or knowing how to win. I don't think it should take year 5 to finally find a bell cow RB. Is AG that good? Applewhite that good? Unsure why he has worked out and the the previous 4 years save Oz, nada at the RB. Attrition for sure with Bell, Washington etc, but why no one in the wings? No development? Did Frost not see the lack of improvement in the RB room under Held?I understand the angst retaining SF has caused for some. Many were ready to move on after last year. To be fair I don't think the pieces have been in place in the four years Scott has been here. We all hoped he could turn a sows ear into a silk purse over night. Scott has never had running backs, receivers and quarterbacks this talented since he has been at Nebraska. The defense is less than effective it seems so if we are going to win games it will have to be the offense.....with an O line that still has issues. We definitely miss Cam and Noueli and I don't think Prohaska is anywhere near full strength. The line will be a work in progress to get them to average. I hope the truth is that Scott and Whip are on the same page and there is not division amongst either of them.
I don't think we will ever know TBH. I'm sure it is hard for Frost. BUT he knows the B1G, knows the players and has been calling plays for 4 years. I'd think as the OC Whip (or any new one) would seek out advise from the HC and other staff to get a system that can win.Did Frost hire Whipple or is this a Bob Diaco situation?
Definitely a Diaco situation. Anybody that thinks for a minute that Frost gave up play calling of his own volition is nuts. And he is egotistical and unhappy enough to cast aspersions on Whipple’s play calling anytime things don’t go perfectly. It’s obvious to me that Frost sees the writing on the wall and has for quite awhile. It’s the only explanation that would allow him to question the offense while the defense is obviously the much larger problem.Did Frost hire Whipple or is this a Bob Diaco situation?
For full disclosure I thought the D last year was good (improving). Then I read these stats....(copied from Huskermax)Definitely a Diaco situation. Anybody that thinks for a minute that Frost gave up play calling of his own volition is nuts. And he is egotistical and unhappy enough to cast aspersions on Whipple’s play calling anytime things don’t go perfectly. It’s obvious to me that Frost sees the writing on the wall and has for quite awhile. It’s the only explanation that would allow him to question the offense while the defense is obviously the much larger problem.
That’s called Desperation. Not a good look and will cause turmoil in the locker room. Can this guy do anything right?It was clear in the stadium that frost was more involved in the sideline huddles at the beginning of every new drive. More than once Whip was on the sideline while Frost sent the offense in during the second half.
Not taking away from the rest of your post here, but thats what “great” backs do and will help eleviate stress on the OL from thinking they need to do more than what they can actually accomplish.In both halves Grant salvaged the running game by bouncing out of holes that weren't there.
Spot on.Not taking away from the rest of your post here, but thats what “great” backs do and will help eleviate stress on the OL from thinking they need to do more than what they can actually accomplish.
Optimistically speaking, that can slow down the game for the OL and improve the team overall.
That’s called Desperation. Not a good look and will cause turmoil in the locker room. Can this guy do anything right?
My understanding is that HCSF was supposed to transition into more of a hands-off, big picture, CEO-like role (like most major college football programs operate). Grabbing the playbook from your new OC in the 7th quarter of the new season would be the opposite of that.So let me get this straight. The situation is the offense was floundering so Frost took a more active role and they scored 31 points compared to 7 in the first half and you are gonna still turn that into a bad thing. I guess he should have done nothing so there wont be imaginary turmoil that you made up
Well first we really dont know how much control he took. And second whatever happened worked so who cares. Do you think these other coaches that you claim are all CEO type just never have input on play calling? Id be willing to bet and overwhelming majority of them have a huge say in play calls on one side of the ball at least.My understanding is that HCSF was supposed to transition into more of a hands-off, big picture, CEO-like role (like most major college football programs operate). Grabbing the playbook from your new OC in the 7th quarter of the new season would be the opposite of that.