One-Time Transfer Rule On the Way Out?

Toe said:
This wasn't the NCAA's decision.
Click to expand...
Yes, but they are losing their hold on college sports.  They are just stepping aside & letting this s#!t happen.  Lightly regulated NIL & lawsuits to supersede regulations.  College sports are moving toward professional were money buys championships & no regulating body. 

 
SouthLincoln Husker said:
Yes, but they are losing their hold on college sports.  They are just stepping aside & letting this s#!t happen.  Lightly regulated NIL & lawsuits to supersede regulations.  College sports are moving toward professional were money buys championships & no regulating body. 
Click to expand...
It doesn't sound like you watch much professional sports.  Money also does not buy championships these days, and it is pretty hilarious watching teams still try to do that. 

 
SouthLincoln Husker said:
Baseball, basketball - this is why it's the same teams every year. 
Click to expand...
It's not though. People say that and the Denver Nuggets and Texas Rangers just won for the first time in forever/ever.  The Arizona Diamondbacks were in the world series.  The Dodgers spend money, they've only won a short season Covid championship in the last 35 years.  The Mets blew everyone away in payroll and missed the playoffs entirely last year.  It doesn't buy championships, and it isn't the same team winning every year.   That happens way more in college football actually, which is what you are comparing this to.  :lol:   

 
Last edited by a moderator:
runningblind said:
It's not though. People say that and the Denver Nuggets and Texas Rangers just won for the first time in forever/ever.  The Arizona Diamondbacks were in the world series.  The Dodgers spend money, they've only won a short season Covid championship in the last 35 years.  The Mets blew everyone away in payroll and missed the playoffs entirely last year.  It doesn't buy championships, and it isn't the same team winning every year.   That happens way more in college football actually, which is what you are comparing this to.  :lol:   
Click to expand...
Denver is #6 & Rangers is #5.  Looks like money

 
SouthLincoln Husker said:
Denver is #6 & Rangers is #5.  Looks like money
Click to expand...


Rangers were #9 in payroll.  The top three didn't even make the playoffs.  Tampa Bay had the second-best record in the AL with the #28 payroll.

Denver was #8 in payroll.  Sacramento and Memphis had the second- and third-best records in the West with the #23 and #26 payrolls.

Looks like not.

 
Mavric said:
Rangers were #9 in payroll.  The top three didn't even make the playoffs.  Tampa Bay had the second-best record in the AL with the #28 payroll.

Denver was #8 in payroll.  Sacramento and Memphis had the second- and third-best records in the West with the #23 and #26 payrolls.

Looks like not.
Click to expand...
Not what I found. 

 
Mavric said:
Rangers were #9 in payroll.  The top three didn't even make the playoffs.  Tampa Bay had the second-best record in the AL with the #28 payroll.

Denver was #8 in payroll.  Sacramento and Memphis had the second- and third-best records in the West with the #23 and #26 payrolls.

Looks like not.
Click to expand...
They were 50 to 60m over the average. 

 
SouthLincoln Husker said:
They were 50 to 60m over the average. 
Click to expand...
Long time Rangers fan here. We have thrown money around for years and nothing. Built new stadiums, signed big time players to monster contracts.....nothing. Only happened when they finally decided to put a good skipper in charge. It has been BRUTAL!!

 
mwj98 said:
Long time Rangers fan here. We have thrown money around for years and nothing. Built new stadiums, signed big time players to monster contracts.....nothing. Only happened when they finally decided to put a good skipper in charge. It has been BRUTAL!!
Click to expand...
Im a Pirate fan, that's brutal.  They spend no money & it shows! 

 
runningblind said:
It doesn't sound like you watch much professional sports.  Money also does not buy championships these days, and it is pretty hilarious watching teams still try to do that. 
Click to expand...




I would add, as much as money does buy championships (or helps to get them), that has always been the case with college football. It was just less direct. The teams with money had more and better facilities, food, clothing, tutoring, etc., that they could offer the players. The programs with $ did everything they could except give the players cash. Cash is a step up from that, but it's not like the playing field was even.

And in fact, I would say in college football things were more lopsided than in the NFL. It just didn't involve player salaries.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top