Same as last year, Huskers at Illini, Friday night, FS1 telecast. Huskers won .... I believe underdog
https://www.espn.com/college-football/boxscore/_/gameId/401520301
Makes it exceedingly difficult to host recruits that weekend. I suppose it's Nebraska's turn to lose that weekend, since Illinois had to last year.
This is the biggest detriment for me; you only get so many opportunities to use your best advantages in recruiting, and moving from Saturday to Friday hurts a lot in terms of getting kids on campus.
It does. But it's really not a ton different than having an 11 am kickoff on Saturday.
Sounds like we may be getting a lot of night games on the other games. So it all evens out.
I think the recruiting loss is overstated. In-season recruiting is a shell of what it used to be with all of the early commits as well as having official visits allowed in the spring/summer. The majority of our game visits are for local guys and underclassmen. Add in there is a decent chance this was an 11am kick on Saturday, so there is a good chance there wouldn't have been any official visits anyways.
We also have the CU game 2 weeks prior, that will be the one they load up with 'croots, not Illinois.
To whom? The high school players that are playing games on Friday night?Well, and the other side of that coin is there's not a lot of competition for TV eyes on a Friday night. So, even though we lose out on that weekend, recruting-wise, it's a large billboard to showcase the program on.
To whom? The high school players that are playing games on Friday night?
I get that marketing and brand exposure angle, but I don't think it helps recruiting.No, but to the millions of other people who aren't high school football players and are looking for something to watch on a traditionally dead night for television, sure.
I agree.I get that marketing and brand exposure angle, but I don't think it helps recruiting.
I get that marketing and brand exposure angle, but I don't think it helps recruiting.