Nope. You're down the wrong path here.
You can find a more thorough explanation of my thoughts on recruiting elsewhere. But you're talking about two different things. The reasons for our recruiting being down is quite a different discussion from whether it is down or not.
According to the 247 Composite, we didn't even recruit two of the top three players in the state in the Class of 2024. And we have work to do to avoid losing the top two guys in the Class of 2025. Not sure that's a great track record.
So he's recruiting at Mike Riley's level? There's a ringing endorsement.
We only missed being the first to offer Raiola by a couple of days because we wanted to wait until he got on campus to offer him. He visited campus multiple times And he was very strongly considering Nebraska before picking Georgia originally. It's pretty fair to say the previous staff put significantly more effort into recruiting Raiola that Rhule's staff did (not that I blame Rhule for that). But thanks for the great example proving my point about people wanting to credit Rhule for everything.
Perhaps he didn't pay enough attention to the wind.
I'll take Deflections and Excuses for $1000, Alex.
I mean, it's not like there is a ton of other discussion going on. Why can we at least talk about something? :thumbs
You gotta show me how to isolate and respond to specific quotes––that's a handy trick! For now I'll have to respond to your full post, like a jabroni...
As for recruiting, I absolutely agree that
why it's down is a completely different conversation than
if it is. But that's not what you originally said. You insinuated that
Rhule's recruiting has been pretty average (or below average), as if he has somehow fumbled the royal torch that was passed to him. I could be mistaken, but if you were simply meaning to say that recruiting is down, why would you sandwich that in between two clear criticisms of Rhule? To say that he has been pretty average or below, in the context you used, would imply that he is underperforming.
The two players from 2024 that we let slip through our fingers...one ended up at South Dakota, and the other signed with Northern Iowa. The other heavy-hitters that comprised their offer list were: Dartmouth, Fordham, Wyoming, Montana, Northern Illinois, and Coastal Carolina. I'm not trying to pooh on those two kids, I'm sure they're good players and great kids. But that's an odd thing to bring up as knock on Rhule's recruiting. And I said Rhule has done a
solid job in state, not
great. We certainly have work to do with the top guys in 2025, but look who we're fighting for their services. Considering that Omaha kids tend to not possess great loyalty to this program (a trend that has accelerated the last 20 years), I would say it's somewhat impressive what Rhule has done in the town up north that has little to no relatability to the rest of the state. From all accounts, before Rhule got here we were an afterthought for Hall, McMorris, and Benning; all three of which have higher composite ratings and more impressive offer lists than the two guys you referenced. Not to mention that borderline 5* Carter Nelson was anything but a lock. Like I said, a lot can happen between now and December. In my opinion, this season is a crossroads for the program. One way or the other.
And I'm sorry to break it to ya, but we've been a Mike Riley level program ever since Colorado hung a 60-burger on us back in '01.
I'm not denying that we've been after Raiola long before Rhule got here. That's why I said he shouldn't receive all the credit, but the dude deserves some. And it's been heavily discussed here and anywhere else that talks about Husker football that a previous coach on the previous staff had a few...
unfavorable experiences with the Raiola family. I haven't talked with Dylan about it (still waiting for his response to my Facebook messages), but I would bet that the family ties and history with the university were the main reasons he is here. However, I would argue that this staff was more influential in his commitment than the previous one.
I wasn't deflecting about the misconduct in regards to the assistant coaches. Whether I agree with it or not, this stuff is erased from memory as long as the wins come. I mean, look at Georgia. They currently have a serious issue with automotive accidents and incidents within the program that has persisted for some time now. Just last week it was reported that Kirby had a speaker come in and give another presentation/lecture to the entire team, and not 24 hours later two players were busted for racing each other on a main street in Athens. Is there culture issues at Georgia? Should we be concerned about Kirby's judge of character or control within his program? And yes, I know that one issue involves 18 year old kids and the other is grown-up coaches. But one issue has caused deaths and the other, at worst, has cost marriages (allegedly). And judging by the numbers in this country, that is a 50/50 chance anyway. All this is a roundabout way to say that it's easy to look the other way when Playoff appearances are the norm. IF we win 8 games and that momentum carries into recruiting, all this coaching stuff will be forgotten like a good shake to an Etch A Sketch. Not defending or justifying it. It just is what it is.