BigRedBuster
Well-known member
You claim this list shows Obama as being bad. Then you go vote for Trump. :laughpoundApsu said:
The 2024 Election —What did we learn?
- Thread starter TGHusker
- Start date
Apsu
New member
Thankfully the floodgates had not yet opened up, and with the loss of the Democrats it will be stopped and reversed.
Apsu
New member
I had assumed that you were paying at least a little bit of attention, but I was wrong.
Democrat Party politics is very strongly influenced by both Bill & Hillary Clinton, and Barrack Obama.
funhusker
Active member
No. They will just stop talking about it like it doesn’t exist and everyone will assume that fixed something that was never a problem.
Kind of like the Haitians eating pets and gangs running Aurora.
You all got duped by bulls#!t. It is what it is. Hopefully they don’t mess stuff up that actually exists.
Apsu
New member
There may have been more male boxers trying to pass as women in the recent Olympics than pets eaten in Auroa, but you are on a roll spewing the best of what you know.
Guy Chamberlin
Well-known member
You've described your political ideology based mostly on candidates least likely to start and maintain wars. While I agree the Dems have been rather hawkish of late, it's typically an overcompensation designed to undermine even more hawkish Republicans by getting them to vote with them. It's an incredible stretch to consider your GOP candidates more vested in peace, but if you have the mental gymnastics to portray Vladimir Putin as the victim in a Ukraine conspiracy, there's not much left to stretch. The guy you voted for isn't about to stop the bloodshed in the Middle East either, though he does seem interested in speeding it up.
Some of your claims against Obama are accurate, some are not. I'd really like to see the research that concludes Obama started more wars than the Bushes.
I'm not speaking for BigRedBuster, but perhaps both he and I noticed that you blame Obama for being the Deporter-in-Chief (which he was) while voting for a candidate who has promised to be even worse.
BigRedBuster
Well-known member
To answer the original question. ‘Merica, hasn’t learned s#!t.
funhusker
Active member
Both boxers were identified as female on birth certificates according to the countries of origin. One of the countries in question also makes it illegal for males to “pass as female”.
Sounds like you should be supportive of their efforts!
But go ahead, keep lapping this crap up. I’m just done trying to help you. It’s too late for that.
Lorewarn
Active member
Apsu
New member
Sounds like you do not know what a Y chromosome is, which is not tested for when a birth certificate is issued.
But go ahead, keep lapping this crap up. I’m just done trying to help you. It’s too late for that.
funhusker
Active member
You mean the XY chromosomes that were identified by one Russian pissed off that his boxer lost and never released the results to anyone else. By the way, a Y chromosome that just randomly appeared one random year since the boxers passed those same tests in the years prior.
Funny...
Last edited by a moderator:
Danny Bateman
Donor
You dare to question the judgment of Mother Russia?
You are no true comrade. To the gulag with you.
Nebfanatic
New member
It's pretty funny you want to claim you know the difference between boys and girls and you still can get them mixed up this badly
Guy Chamberlin
Well-known member
While any of us could Google an article where someone claims men can get pregnant, the number of people who actually believe or promote it is as small as Laura Ingram's penis.