No that was the problem with the coaches the year before when Solich went 7-7. Coaches like George Darlington and Milt Tenipor were GREAT coaches but not motivated recruiters at that point in their careers. When Solich brought in these new coaches in '03 the Huskers went 10-3, so I think they will be able to recruit and most importantly motivate and get the best out of their players.Wasn't that a problem with the old coaches and Solich in that they didn't know how to RECRUIT?
PUD said they could not recruit. We will be better off with middle of the road recruiters and Coaches that can develop players. We are getting those coaches. GO BIG RED!!! :w00tWasn't that a problem with the old coaches and Solich in that they didn't know how to RECRUIT?
That was the mantra sung by Pud. Screw Pud. You can see where his theory got us. If we retro to the Solich era, works for me. I'll take .750 and an occasional shot at the title and so will everyone else on this board.Wasn't that a problem with the old coaches and Solich in that they didn't know how to RECRUIT?
WELL YOU WOULD THINK HE WOULD FIRE PPLS THAT WAS UNDERPERFORMING NEWAYS,BUT IAM THINKING ALL THE COACHING STAFF WILL BE GONE WITHIN 2 YEARSplus, i believe bo would fire anyone that was underperforming as a coach, unlike callahan
so if someone wasn't holding up their end of the deal recruiting wise, i don't think he'd hesitate to let them go
your reasoning doesn't make sense, the team that went 10-3 would be Solich's 02 and before staff not the newer guys who you said could recuirt better, those guys would have been on Cally's team, so they were better coaches overallNo that was the problem with the coaches the year before when Solich went 7-7. Coaches like George Darlington and Milt Tenipor were GREAT coaches but not motivated recruiters at that point in their careers. When Solich brought in these new coaches in '03 the Huskers went 10-3, so I think they will be able to recruit and most importantly motivate and get the best out of their players.Wasn't that a problem with the old coaches and Solich in that they didn't know how to RECRUIT?
What I was trying to say is that the "old coaches" before '03 were not good recruiters. The '03 staff really didn't have a chance to recruit but proved they were good coaches. They were still Solich's old staff's recruits, but Solcih had to change and adapt to get better players to compete.your reasoning doesn't make sense, the team that went 10-3 would be Solich's 02 and before staff not the newer guys who you said could recuirt better, those guys would have been on Cally's team, so they were better coaches overallNo that was the problem with the coaches the year before when Solich went 7-7. Coaches like George Darlington and Milt Tenipor were GREAT coaches but not motivated recruiters at that point in their careers. When Solich brought in these new coaches in '03 the Huskers went 10-3, so I think they will be able to recruit and most importantly motivate and get the best out of their players.Wasn't that a problem with the old coaches and Solich in that they didn't know how to RECRUIT?
plus, i believe bo would fire anyone that was underperforming as a coach, unlike callahan
so if someone wasn't holding up their end of the deal recruiting wise, i don't think he'd hesitate to let them go