I agree. We should be talking about how much inexperience we will have. We're going to have a QB that has seen very very very little to zero playing time. I think we're making a huge mistake by not getting the #2 and #3 in there.With all the seniors on the team, especially along the line and at the skill positions this thread should probably be about what positions will be worse next year, not better.
How do you know the #2 and #3 will be playing next year?I agree. We should be talking about how much inexperience we will have. We're going to have a QB that has seen very very very little to zero playing time. I think we're making a huge mistake by not getting the #2 and #3 in there.
Ummm, I don't know. I am not the one making the decisions, but I get the impression that the reason they aren't playing the backups QBs is because the QB they want to use next year isn't here yet.I don't. How many top teams are playing QB's with zero experience?
or he is running the scout team!Ummm, I don't know. I am not the one making the decisions, but I get the impression that the reason they aren't playing the backups QBs is because the QB they want to use next year isn't here yet.I don't. How many top teams are playing QB's with zero experience?
We didn't even hand the keys over to true frosh Tommie until after some games. If these coaches are putting all their eggs in that basket, then we're in big trouble. Let's take a trip down memory lane with regards to QB recruits. We recruit this high powered QB named Beck. Even though he left, he wasn't good at all. He's what like 3rd or 4th string now in his senior year? Next comes Freeman. Even though he didn't come here and went to KState, what has he done other than 2 good games against Texas that has really impressed anyone? He's in his 3rd year starting, and he ranks a lot closer to bottom in the Big 12 than top. The jury is still out on Blaine Gabbert. However, I think it's safe to say he won't be starting for Mizzou next year. We won't be able to see how "gifted" he is for another 2 years.Ummm, I don't know. I am not the one making the decisions, but I get the impression that the reason they aren't playing the backups QBs is because the QB they want to use next year isn't here yet.I don't. How many top teams are playing QB's with zero experience?
Gabbert will almost certainly be the starter next season. He's currently #3 behind 2 seniors.The jury is still out on Blaine Gabbert. However, I think it's safe to say he won't be starting for Mizzou next year. We won't be able to see how "gifted" he is for another 2 years.
Number 21 in passing yards so far in the season and he's not impressive? Considering the lack of talent around him (with the exception of one individual), I would say that's pretty damn good...Next comes Freeman. Even though he didn't come here and went to KState, what has he done other than 2 good games against Texas that has really impressed anyone? He's in his 3rd year starting, and he ranks a lot closer to bottom in the Big 12 than top. The jury is still out on Blaine Gabbert. However, I think it's safe to say he won't be starting for Mizzou next year. We won't be able to see how "gifted" he is for another 2 years.
Again. I'm not saying I agree with it, but I think the reason they did not get any reps is because the QB they want to have the reps is not here yet.Daniel didn't play the 4th qtr. Why was Ganz still playing in the 4th? What purpose did it serve other than not getting our #2 and #3 any reps at all. Pi$$ poor player management if you ask me.
QB is obvious. I think Linebackers and defensive tackles. The o-line will have some questions but I do not think those shoes will be that big to fill. The talent on the O-line is somewhat parallel.With all the seniors on the team, especially along the line and at the skill positions this thread should probably be about what positions will be worse next year, not better.