He can still be tagged as a reason for why we lost. Yes, two of his picks were catchable balls, but the second of the two was way overthrown (still, if the receiver touches it, his responsibility to catch it, but Lee still should have thrown it better) and the third pick was just down right horrible. He didn't personally cost the game, but he's a reason we didn't win, as was every other reason. They culminated into one huge clusterf*ck.Vince from ShamWOW said:jliehr said:I was merely pointing out Watson's statement, but, to say that a QB played perfect (or even well), when he fumbled twice and threw 3 picks (granted we got both fumbles back) is a joke.Vince from ShamWOW said:huskerstuckinmichigan said:Ok, to quote another BAD coach we had not so long ago, "we are doing excellent in every phase of the game." Or something like that. I asked this question in another thread, could some coaches heads be buried in the sand? The article quoted Watson as saying Green is gaining a lot of ground on Lee?jliehr said:Also from Sip, in a blog post. I just vomited in my mouth a little bit.
* Bo Pelini said it was an easy decision to start Zac Lee over freshman Cody Green. Offensive coordinator Shawn Watson said the coaches never considered inserting Green into Saturday's game.
"Lee managed a great game, guys," Watson said. "I'm just telling you, he was perfect."
Perfect? Really?
"As far as getting us in the right plays and doing the things we asked him to do in this game plan, he did a really nice job," Watson said.
That said, the QB issue obviously isn't going away.
Here are the facts. Had the receievers caught all catchable balls and Paul would have hung on the TD he was running for NU would have won. Lee played really well, not perfect, but really well. THIS LOSS HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH LEE.
Lee didn't play perfect. But he cannot be tagged for this loss. Two of his picks easily should have been caught. Mental and physical toughness prevented them, and several others, from being caught.