Winds of change
It was a beautiful autumn day in Lincoln on Saturday, except of course for the 35 mile per hour wind that was whipping through Husker Nation. Most Nebraskans have become accustomed to these strong winds, and most know that a wind like that usually precedes either a calm and beautiful night or a violent, window-rattling storm. Well, Saturday night the wind died and it turned out to be a beautiful evening. It remains to be seen, however, which fate awaits the football team this season. There was never any real doubt that Nebraska was going to win the game Saturday, but most of the questions that fans had after the Maine game remain unanswered.
The defense is obviously improved, and some of the plays they have been making are winning games for us. The winds of change have definitely affected the direction of public doubt and criticism. It's been two weeks since I've heard the name of the defensive coordinator or secondary coach even mentioned. Nebraska fans have turned their fierce gaze elsewhere. Personally, I think some praise is due the defensive staff after the off-season they had to endure. I grant you that we have not exactly played the two best offenses in the country, but without complete dominance by the D in the first game, and some forced mistakes that turned to points this week, both games would have been close. You can't count on defensive touchdowns every week, but there are teams that scrape out really good years by being dominant on defense and being conservative (just not losing the games) on offense. That's not really the M.O. of this offensive style, however.
This leads me to the meat of my blog this week. Everywhere I go, people want to know what I think of the offense. They want to know whether our version of the west coast offense will work here. They want to know if we can use Nebraska kids to run it. They want to know if the old power option offense is out-dated. I don't have the answers to these questions, but I can offer some opinion.
First off, let me say this. Tom Osborne is a very smart man, and he spent his whole career at Nebraska figuring out the best ways to win in Lincoln. This is evidenced by the fact that his best 5 years as a coach were his last 5. How many times this Saturday do you think our coaches looked out the windows at the wind bending trees and blowing trash and think, "huh, maybe those guys weren't so dumb. In my opinion there are a lot of reasons why coach Osborne's offense worked for Nebraska. Here are some of the most important ones:
1. The weather- We all know how nasty it can get in Lincoln in the late fall. Saturday was one of the first times in 30 years that inclement weather has probably benefited a visiting team. The offense of old would just power through rain, wind, and snow.
2. Resources- Obviously Nebraska does not generate the kind of talent coming out of high school that states like Texas, Florida, and California do. We have some talented kids from the state, but not enough to make a team a national title contender. What we do have is a bunch of big, strong, hard working kids that will work harder and care more about the team than most people. The old way was to bring those kids in (by scholarship or walk-on) and let them develop into solid lineman, fullbacks, etc. Then if you could go out and recruit some defensive backs, running backs, and maybe a multi-threat quarterback that only a few other schools are recruiting, you had the makings of a championship team. In this system we have to out-recruit the likes of Texas, Florida State, and USC to run the same type of system they are running. So far we have been really successful doing that, but you have to do it every year to keep up with them.
3. Commitment- The old way was to bank on the love of the program and dedication to a place and group of coaches that cared more about the players than most coaches do. This bond that the players felt for Nebraska was the reason why guys would work their tails off for four years just to get a chance to see the field for one year. It is why we hadn't had anyone since Johnny Mitchell leave for the pros early until last year. I've been in another program, and I saw that most guys are thinking of college as either a way to get to pro football or a way to get an education. At Nebraska, being a Husker was special. I is what made guys willing to run through walls to win.
4. Walk-ons- Using this commitment and bond that players felt toward the program, we were able to get guys to come to Nebraska that were not "scholarship guys" coming out of high school. The problem is, if it were obvious which guys were going to end up being the best players when they were seniors in high school, then the top teams in the country should never be beat. We used to get those guys to come here, develop them, and give them equal status and fair chances. Willingness to do this is why we ended up with 5 or 6 starters a year that were walk-ons. Some of those guys will take scholarships to the Iowa States of the world rather than walk on here, but if you're willing to push for those guys it can pay off in the end.
5. Consistency- Winning a championship in college football is not like winning it in any other sport. To win in college football you have to be good every single week. In college basketball or the NFL you can slip up a couple of times as long as you are strong during playoff time. It is so easy to be consistent when you are a power team that just plain bullies any team that steps on the field with you. We may have only had 70 or 80 plays in the nineties, but we practiced them so many times that we couldn't help but be a well-oiled machine. Add this to the fact that a power/option offense does not turn the ball over and beat themselves, and you can see why it was easy to be consistent. It was no accident that T.O. had so many 9 and ten win seasons. USC has been able to find consistency with the west coast offense, so it can be done, but they're talent has been vastly superior to other pac-10 teams the last couple of years.
6. Run-game- You don't have to be able to run the ball to win, but it sure helps. One of the things that made our old offense run the ball so well(aside from our dominant offensive lines) was our ability to change running plays at the line. Most offenses I've seen are structured to be able to change into and out of pass plays at the line based on coverages and blitzes, but very few will change run plays based on fronts and shades of defensive lineman. Our offense now tries to get teams in bad situations by shifting and motioning. Our offense then did it by seeing what the defense was going to do and picking a play that would beat it. The Colts do it a lot right now when Manning comes to the line and starts his cadence. He lets the other team show him what they're going to do and he gets them in a play that will give them the best chance to expose it. I'm not sure why more teams don't audible more running plays.
There you have it. I apologize for the wordiness of this analysis, but when you love football you tend to think about it a lot. All that being said, there is always more than one way to skin a cat. When I was with the Bucs, I heard Jon Gruden say several times that the west coast offense is the best offensive system that has ever been devised. I don't doubt that we can win with this system if we have the right talent running it. Part of the old-school in me wishes we weren't making ourselves like everybody else-when we used to have such a uniqueness and identity- but winning is winning. If this is the best way to get Nebraska back up to the top then I'm all for it. Let the winds blow as they will as long as they blow the Huskers back towards national prominence!