Big 12 standings update

[fro daddy]

as of 3/19 (PRESEASON COACHES POLL RANK)

1. Oklahoma (4) 17-2 .895

2. Oklahoma State (5) 10-2 .833

3. Kansas State (7) 13-3 .812

4. Texas A&M (3) 13-3 .812

5. Texas (1) 13-4 .765

6. Baylor (6) 11-6 .647

6. Kansas (2) 11-6 .647

8. Missouri (8) 8-6 .571

9. Nebraska (8) 8-7 .533

10.Texas Tech (10) 8-10 .444

 

[huskerswrkhavoc]

as of 3/19 (PRESEASON COACHES POLL RANK)

1. Oklahoma (4) 17-2 .895

2. Oklahoma State (5) 10-2 .833

3. Kansas State (7) 13-3 .812

4. Texas A&M (3) 13-3 .812

5. Texas (1) 13-4 .765

6. Baylor (6) 11-6 .647

6. Kansas (2) 11-6 .647

8. Missouri (8) 8-6 .571

9. Nebraska (8) 8-7 .533

10.Texas Tech (10) 8-10 .444

Thing is, with no conference games played this means nothing. If we would of played k-states schedule we'd be at least 13-3 also.... At least we finally get into the conference slate today.. Sucks NU has to play the 2 of the 3 best in the conference 1-2...

 

[fro daddy]

as of 3/19 (PRESEASON COACHES POLL RANK)

1. Oklahoma (4) 17-2 .895

2. Oklahoma State (5) 10-2 .833

3. Kansas State (7) 13-3 .812

4. Texas A&M (3) 13-3 .812

5. Texas (1) 13-4 .765

6. Baylor (6) 11-6 .647

6. Kansas (2) 11-6 .647

8. Missouri (8) 8-6 .571

9. Nebraska (8) 8-7 .533

10.Texas Tech (10) 8-10 .444

Thing is, with no conference games played this means nothing. If we would of played k-states schedule we'd be at least 13-3 also.... At least we finally get into the conference slate today.. Sucks NU has to play the 2 of the 3 best in the conference 1-2...

I wanted to go though and get the SOS and number of top 50 teams played, but didnt have the time. I just wanted to update the standings pretty much through the non-con. I will do standings updates through out the conference season as well

 

[huskerswrkhavoc]

as of 3/19 (PRESEASON COACHES POLL RANK)

1. Oklahoma (4) 17-2 .895

2. Oklahoma State (5) 10-2 .833

3. Kansas State (7) 13-3 .812

4. Texas A&M (3) 13-3 .812

5. Texas (1) 13-4 .765

6. Baylor (6) 11-6 .647

6. Kansas (2) 11-6 .647

8. Missouri (8) 8-6 .571

9. Nebraska (8) 8-7 .533

10.Texas Tech (10) 8-10 .444

Thing is, with no conference games played this means nothing. If we would of played k-states schedule we'd be at least 13-3 also.... At least we finally get into the conference slate today.. Sucks NU has to play the 2 of the 3 best in the conference 1-2...

I wanted to go though and get the SOS and number of top 50 teams played, but didnt have the time. I just wanted to update the standings pretty much through the non-con. I will do standings updates through out the conference season as well

I understand, and thanks for doin that fro. I just feel teams like KSU are over hyped atm because they have played no1, similar to nebraska last year. A&M is still questionable also... When I'm on a computer tonight after work (like 2 am) I can get all of boyds isr numbers to put next to everyone if you'd like.

 

[fro daddy]

i know where your coming from. and that would be great if you could do that.

 

[huskerswrkhavoc]

i know where your coming from. and that would be great if you could do that.

Well I didn't get to them before the games from friday (i hadnt been on a computer forever, just my phone), but now I have the ISR's from boydsworld.com...

Boyd's Iterative Strength Ratings

Basically what these are are his way of determining the true strength of a team once play begins.. It's similar to the RPI used by the NCAA, but has actually proven to better predict the finish of teams..

1. Oklahoma - ISR = 13 SOS = 81

2. Oklahoma State - ISR = 31 SOS = 154

3. Kansas State - ISR = 38 SOS = 170

4. Texas A&M - ISR = 6 SOS = 28

5. Texas - ISR = 5 SOS = 13

6. Baylor - ISR = 76 SOS = 102

6. Kansas - ISR = 59 SOS = 49

8. Missouri - ISR = 93 SOS = 146

9. Nebraska - ISR = 52 SOS = 5

10.Texas Tech - ISR = 88 SOS = 26

 

[fro daddy]

As of 4/1 Conference wins (overall record) - upcoming weekend series

1. Kansas State 3-0 (20-3) Texas Tech

2. Oklahoma 3-1 (22-3) Texas

3. Texas 4-2 (18-7) Oklahoma

3. Texas A&M 4-2 (17-7) Kansas

5. Kansas 2-1 (17-9) Texas A&M

6. Nebraska 2-4 (14-11) Oklahama State

6. Texas Tech 2-4 (12-15) Kansas State

8. Missouri 1-2 (14-9) Baylor

9. Baylor 1-3 (13-9) Missouri

10.Oklahoma State 0-3 (15-7) Nebraska

 

[fro daddy]

As of 4/7 Conference wins (overall record) - upcoming weekend series

1. Texas 7-2 (22-7) Kansas

2. Kansas State 4-2 (21-5) Nebraska

3. Texas A&M 5-3-1 (19-8-1) Baylor

4. Kansas 3-2-1 (18-10-1) Texas

5. Texas Tech 4-5 (15-17) Oklahoma State

6. Oklahoma 3-4 (23-6) Missouri

6. Baylor 3-4 (16-10) Texas A&M

8. Nebraska 3-6 (15-14) Kansas State

8. Oklahoma State 2-4 (17-9) Texas Tech

8. Missouri 2-4 (16-11) Oklahoma

 

[fro daddy]

As of 4/20 Conference wins (overall record) - upcoming weekend series

1. Texas 13-2 (30-7) Ollahoma St

2. Kansas State 9-3 (26-8)Missouri

3. Texas Tech 8-7 (20-19) Kansas

4. Oklahoma 6-7 (26-10) Texas A&M

5. Kansas 5-6-1 (22-14-1) Texas Tech

6. Texas A&M 6-8-1 (20-14-1) Oklahoma

7. Oklahoma State 5-7 (21-13) Texas

8. Baylor 5-8 (21-14) Nebraska

9. Nebraska 5-10 (18-18) Baylor

9. Missouri 4-8 (19-16) Kansas State

 

[fro daddy]

As of 4/26 Conference wins (overall record) - upcoming weekend series

1. Texas 16-2 (34-7) Baylor

2. Kansas State 9-5 (27-10) Oklahoma

3. Texas Tech 10-8(24-20) Missouri

4. Oklahoma 8-8(29-11) Kansas State

5. Baylor 7-9 (24-16) Texas

6. Kansas 6-8-1 (25-16-1) Oklahoma State

7. Missouri 6-8 (21-17) Texas Tech

8. Texas A&M 7-10-1(22-16-1) Nebraska

9. Nebraska 6-12(19-21) Texas A&M

9. Oklahoma State 5-10(23-16) Kansas

 

[fro daddy]

As of 5/4 Conference wins (overall record) - upcoming weekend series

1. Texas 19-2(38-7) Kansas State

2. Kansas State 10-7 (30-12) Texas

3. Texas Tech 12-9(26-22) Baylor

4. Oklahoma 10-9(32-12)Oklahoma state

5. Texas A&M 9-11-1(25-17-1) NON CON

6. Kansas 7-10-1(26-19-1)Missouri

7. Missouri 7-10(23-19)Kansas

8. Oklahoma State 7-11(26-18)Oklahoma

9. Baylor 7-12(25-20) Texas Tech

10. Nebraska 7-14 (20-24) NON CON

 

[CBHusker]

I wish I could have tracked the Huskers' team ERA during the season.

I'm also impressed with the wide divergence of Coaches' expectations and actual product on the field. Quite a few complete misses.