SaturnDrew
Special Teams Player
Remember though, Colorado is also in the Big 12 :bluffsNebraska had 8 turnovers that game and ISU still barely managed to win. Iowa State will finish last in the Big 12.
Remember though, Colorado is also in the Big 12 :bluffsNebraska had 8 turnovers that game and ISU still barely managed to win. Iowa State will finish last in the Big 12.
Great use of emoticons, I almost forgot about that one. :bluffsRemember though, Colorado is also in the Big 12 :bluffsNebraska had 8 turnovers that game and ISU still barely managed to win. Iowa State will finish last in the Big 12.
HAHA! I know...it should be more easily accessible as it doesn't get used often enoughGreat use of emoticons, I almost forgot about that one. :bluffsRemember though, Colorado is also in the Big 12 :bluffsNebraska had 8 turnovers that game and ISU still barely managed to win. Iowa State will finish last in the Big 12.
IMHO, the best teams in the North break down in this order: Nebraska, Missouri, K-State, Iowa State, Kansas, and then Colorado.Husker B Rent- Say it isn't so my old friend? We got Gill Baby!! Our 3-5 Big 12 North Record should be enough to get us out of the celler. Plus our South schedule flips. We play Baylor, OSU-who lost even more then KU did, and Texas A&M.i wouldnt say that theyll finish last in the big 12, ill reserve that right for kansas or baylor at this point but isu is no better than a 9th place finisher imo.
zac lee was under no pressure on the last one...he simple was trying to get us down the field in a hurryand don't underestimate the front four's affect of pressuring the qb to cause those interceptions.but really the last two interceptions come from forced play at the end of a game we should have already been winning...i think three turnovers we had were actually legit
I respect that Enhance. I think there's more talent left on this Jayhawk team than people think. I would dare say we'll have more playmakers this year, than last with Patterson, Beashers and Quigley moving back to offense. I think the main problem with the Mangino era was his constant shuffling players in and out of positions. You can't get steady improvement when you do that. I'm not expecting much this year. I think 6-6 is very possible for KU with the easier schedule. But I wouldn't be surprised if KU finished 5-7 or 4-8 either. Outside of Nebraska, Missouri (pains me to say that), and Georgia Tech, I'd say the rest of KU's games could be considered toss ups.IMHO, the best teams in the North break down in this order: Nebraska, Missouri, K-State, Iowa State, Kansas, and then Colorado.Husker B Rent- Say it isn't so my old friend? We got Gill Baby!! Our 3-5 Big 12 North Record should be enough to get us out of the celler. Plus our South schedule flips. We play Baylor, OSU-who lost even more then KU did, and Texas A&M.i wouldnt say that theyll finish last in the big 12, ill reserve that right for kansas or baylor at this point but isu is no better than a 9th place finisher imo.
The reasons I have KU below ISU are because Kansas lost a lot of pieces that made them special the last few years, and they also have a coach that is relatively unproven against BCS caliber competition. There are too many question marks to put them above 5th in the North, imho.
But, I still think Gill will eventually do well there and possibly turn them into a contender. However, I just don't see it happening in 2010.
I guess I also should have iterated that I am no Kansas Jayhawk follower, nor do I pay great attention to what goes on in Lawrence or what Gill is doing there.I respect that Enhance. I think there's more talent left on this Jayhawk team than people think. I would dare say we'll have more playmakers this year, than last with Patterson, Beashers and Quigley moving back to offense. I think the main problem with the Mangino era was his constant shuffling players in and out of positions. You can't get steady improvement when you do that. I'm not expecting much this year. I think 6-6 is very possible for KU with the easier schedule. But I wouldn't be surprised if KU finished 5-7 or 4-8 either. Outside of Nebraska, Missouri (pains me to say that), and Georgia Tech, I'd say the rest of KU's games could be considered toss ups.IMHO, the best teams in the North break down in this order: Nebraska, Missouri, K-State, Iowa State, Kansas, and then Colorado.Husker B Rent- Say it isn't so my old friend? We got Gill Baby!! Our 3-5 Big 12 North Record should be enough to get us out of the celler. Plus our South schedule flips. We play Baylor, OSU-who lost even more then KU did, and Texas A&M.i wouldnt say that theyll finish last in the big 12, ill reserve that right for kansas or baylor at this point but isu is no better than a 9th place finisher imo.
The reasons I have KU below ISU are because Kansas lost a lot of pieces that made them special the last few years, and they also have a coach that is relatively unproven against BCS caliber competition. There are too many question marks to put them above 5th in the North, imho.
But, I still think Gill will eventually do well there and possibly turn them into a contender. However, I just don't see it happening in 2010.
:worshipI have no idea what you are all grousing about...the Huskers should be proud that they were part of the greatest victory in ISU football history. That game will live forever in Ames. ISU fans and alumni will be playing it over and over for decades...not to mention local, regional and national media play next season where portions of it will be shown over and over and over. No matter what happens in games in the future, Cyclone fans will be able to say..."Yeah, but remember that game in 09 where we beat you without our starting QB or league leading running back?" You should be happy that Cyclone fans don't have to read any more stories in the paper about Marv Seiler and his amazing slow motion run to beat the Huskers way back when dinosaurs walked the earth. Frankly, we were getting kind of tired of the obligatory Seiler story that came before every meeting Cyclone/Husker game...Marv's a fat banker now and couldn't run ten feet unless there was a steak and a beer waiting for him. Now we have 20 years of news to look forward to featuring "The Fake Punt" and "The Eight Turnovers" and "The QB Who Never Started A Game Until He Beat Nebraska". Thank you Huskers!
All that aside...I'm pretty sure lightening never strikes the same place twice.
BigRedPowerWagon said:You know this just tickles me. I mean someone posted on there about Nebraska not being relevant for 10 years. But my question is when has ISU ever be relevant.
how very dare you. we are relevant from a historical perspective, as in 'wow, i am talking about nebraska because they are so bad now and they were so good then.' see, even when we are bad we are relevant, if only for the very reason we are bad.BigRedPowerWagon said:You know this just tickles me. I mean someone posted on there about Nebraska not being relevant for 10 years. But my question is when has ISU ever be relevant.
nu hasn't been relevant for the last ten years.
the difference??
isu doesn't claim to be relevant. :LOLtartar