sd'sker
Banned
i asked this question in a different thread, but it did not get any responses, and i think this topic is gaining interest and worth talking about.
here it is: or any legal minded huskers (or big 10 fans, or whatever) on here, i have a question about the buy-out. a contract cannot stipulate a 'penalty', no court would uphold such a condition. so often the contract makers will stipulate 'liquidated damages'. the amount of damages that are foreseeable and the conference will reasonably incur by an early departure. now for my question: if the big 12 will receive a greater revenue even without NU and CU, then would not the liquidated damages be nonexistent, because the foreseeable loss will not come to fruition? remedies was not my greatest class, but i was just wondering if anyone else had any thoughts...
here it is: or any legal minded huskers (or big 10 fans, or whatever) on here, i have a question about the buy-out. a contract cannot stipulate a 'penalty', no court would uphold such a condition. so often the contract makers will stipulate 'liquidated damages'. the amount of damages that are foreseeable and the conference will reasonably incur by an early departure. now for my question: if the big 12 will receive a greater revenue even without NU and CU, then would not the liquidated damages be nonexistent, because the foreseeable loss will not come to fruition? remedies was not my greatest class, but i was just wondering if anyone else had any thoughts...
Last edited by a moderator: