A weak schedule may explain why BSU has the most wins in the NCAA since 2000 --- and it may explain the best winning percentage since 2000 --- BUT... does it really logically explain away the reality that BSU is 4-1 v. AP TOP TEN TEAMS since 2000 and all were on the road/neutral sites, none on the Smurf Field? That .800 winning percentage against top 10 teams is also the nations best.
You my friend are simply, it would seem, unwilling to give props were props are due. Why? I have no idea. But BSU has earned its stripes and everyone's respect. They have a great program. I love NU and love our program --- but am willing to concede that the BSU program is outstanding and worthy of respect.
First and foremost, I like Boise State. So let's get that out of the way first.
Second, consider this situation. Let's say it was Ohio State that played Virginia Tech last night and won. They then went on to play a WAC schedule and got an invite to the BCS title game over a one loss Nebraska team that won the Big 12 championship game. Is that fair to you?
The point of the whole scenario is this: they play a weak schedule and thus are mentally and physically prepared for the one/two good teams they play every year. If you put them in the SEC or Big 12 and forced them compete and scheme against the best minds in the business, they would tire out just like everybody else. You put them in the SEC or Big 12 over the last decade, they plain and simply do not win as many games as they have. They're a good program, but they play in a conference barely worthy of a division one ranking. Throw a team like Missouri in for Boise State in the WAC and they probably go 49-4 under a coach too.