Absolutely they can. They've proven that on a regular basis since arriving in the big leagues. All anyone is saying is that it's far easier to get MNC game when you play one tough opponent all year, then cruise through what amounts to a Div.II schedule.Boises weak schedule had a huge impact on their success early on, but with who they are recruiting and coaching anymore, they can compete with anybody I believe.
that is eye opening.Boise's SOS for the past ten years:
2000 - 107
2001 - 98
2002 - 112
2003 - 103
2004 - 78
2005 - 98
2006 - 90
2007 - 113
2008 - 94
2009 - 96
You are fooling yourself if you think these weak schedules have no impact on Boise's success.
Boise's success is solely attributed to coaching and scheduling, imho. They are getting better recruits now than they were before, but they didn't sign one recruit ranked higher than three stars in 2009, and signed only one four star for the 2010 class.Boises weak schedule had a huge impact on their success early on, but with who they are recruiting and coaching anymore, they can compete with anybody I believe.
I dunno. Is Nebraska a legitimate contender? No one seems to question that. But some want to make a premptive case against Boise State in case Boise State runs the table. At least that's how I'm reading this thread.The logic of "because Nebraska is bad we cannot discuss the legitimacy of Boise State" makes no sense. Nebraska's record has nothing to do with whether BSU is a good or bad team.
That is exactly what many Big 10 fans said about Nebraska's schedule in 1997.... You can't hate Boise for being in a weaker conference when they add a big dog to their non con. All they do is keep winning.Have them play a full season in the Big 12 and then face them at the end of the year and we beat them. They would be physically and mentally drained from competing week in and week out, except maybe against Kansas.
I don't see it the way you see it, I guess. Maybe I'm the one off kilter, but I see a lot of people questioning our ranking, pointing out (legitimately) that we have an untested QB, an as-yet unproven line on both sides of the ball, and boneheads at a few other positions. Those of us saying Nebraska belongs in the top ten are basically saying that there aren't ten teams that looked better than us in the first week, and I think that's pretty fair to say.I dunno. Is Nebraska a legitimate contender? No one seems to question that. But some want to make a premptive case against Boise State in case Boise State runs the table. At least that's how I'm reading this thread.The logic of "because Nebraska is bad we cannot discuss the legitimacy of Boise State" makes no sense. Nebraska's record has nothing to do with whether BSU is a good or bad team.
Boise State had a better decade than the Huskers. They're legitimate, even if Boise State still doesn't trip off the tongue like Penn State or Florida State. If we're questioning BCS worthiness based on padded wins and big game history, you gotta ask yourself if Nebraska meets the standard you want to apply to Boise State.
Or to put it another way, if the Huskers shook off the rust and jitters by opening against Virginia Tech, while other contenders warmed up on the likes of Western Kentucky, I think we'd be demanding due credit.
Really? Our SOS was nearly identical to Michigan's in 1997:That is exactly what many Big 10 fans said about Nebraska's schedule in 1997.... You can't hate Boise for being in a weaker conference when they add a big dog to their non con. All they do is keep winning.Have them play a full season in the Big 12 and then face them at the end of the year and we beat them. They would be physically and mentally drained from competing week in and week out, except maybe against Kansas.
In addition, we even played more games.Really? Our SOS was nearly identical to Michigan's in 1997:That is exactly what many Big 10 fans said about Nebraska's schedule in 1997.... You can't hate Boise for being in a weaker conference when they add a big dog to their non con. All they do is keep winning.Have them play a full season in the Big 12 and then face them at the end of the year and we beat them. They would be physically and mentally drained from competing week in and week out, except maybe against Kansas.
Michigan - 75.96
Nebraska - 74.37
Michigan's "better" SOS was negligible at best. That's an argument that has zero credibility.
:facepalm: we show our spines when we play k-state, texas, oklahoma jr., mizzou all in a row and then later play aTm.Not only did they play Virginia Tech the first game of the season, they BEAT Virginia Tech the first game of the season. Where are the other Top 23 teams SPINES? They have won absolutely every game I have counted them out in, excluding TCU- and even then, they were in it to the end.
I wouldn't mind watching them in the National title over 2 loss BCS champions.