Where's the beef? Future NU schedules

Nexus

All-American
There’s been some bold talk this week out of the Boise State camp of supporters. Nobody in a big-boy conference will play Boise. You think that you can beat the Broncos? Give them a call. We dare you.
Nebraska called. Nebraska tried.

In the past year, NU tried to put together a series with BSU; two-for-one, home-and-home, one-way trip to Lincoln. Whatever. It ended up fizzling out. Why?

Because, according to NU Assistant Athletic Director Jeff Jamrog, Boise wanted a minimum $1 million to play in Lincoln.

Geez, no wonder the Broncos can’t get anyone to play them. Pay Boise State $1 million to come to your town? Sorry, don’t want it that bad.

Imagine if that game had come together. Next fall, Nebraska would have played host to Boise State, Fresno State and Washington, and played at Wyoming — before the Big Ten Welcoming Committee opened its arms.

The days of cupcake diets are over at Memorial Stadium. Many Husker fans are glad. They want some protein. They’re going to get it.

Enjoy this year’s menu of Western Kentucky, Idaho and South Dakota State (Football Championship Subdivision) — or not. You might see one or two FCS (formerly known as I-AA) teams in the future, which might be good news for the University of Nebraska at Omaha. More on that later.

Tom Osborne and Bo Pelini don’t want to comment on this year’s nonconference schedule, former Athletic Director Steve Pederson’s last legacy at Nebraska. Their actions said enough.

Beginning next season, Nebraska football has a new nutritionist. Whether that’s good for the long-term health of the program remains to be seen. But it won’t be dull. And the days of cheap jokes aimed at Nebraska’s schedules should be long gone.

2011: Fresno State, Washington, at Wyoming and an opponent that Jamrog says he is close to signing.

2012: Southern Miss, at UCLA.

2013: Wyoming, at Southern Miss, UCLA.

2014: at Fresno State; Miami (Fla.).

2015: at Miami (Fla.), Southern Miss.

2016: Fresno State, Tennessee, Wyoming.

It should be noted that Washington and UCLA were made on Pederson’s watch. But filling in around them with salty Fresno State and dangerous Southern Miss is downright crazy — and bold. Put it as the precursor to Ohio State, Wisconsin, Michigan and Penn State and it’s a guarantee to either knock you out of national title contention or lock you in.

A word about the recently released Big Ten schedule: Most Nebraska fans I hear from love it. They want the big names and the big games, the more the better. And, let’s face it, it won’t always be heavy lifting.

Sure the Big Ten has some meat this year. But two years ago, the Big 12 was the rage with the quarterbacks and the Top 25 teams. And the Big Ten looked soft. Who knows what it will look like in two years?

You can win the national title with a difficult schedule. A team from the Southeastern Conference — widely known as the best in the business — has done it the past four years.

SEC teams get a rap for piling on the cupcakes in the nonconference, though. Is it true?

The 2006 Florida Gators played Western Carolina, Southern Miss, Florida State and Central Florida. In 2007, national champ LSU played Virginia Tech, Middle Tennessee, Tulane and Louisiana Tech. In 2008, Florida had Hawaii, Miami (Fla.), The Citadel and Florida State. Last year, Alabama played Virginia Tech, Florida International, North Texas and Tennessee-Chattanooga.

Nebraska’s future September roads are a notch above those. But Pelini likes what he’s got.

“Next year is just about right," Pelini said. “You don’t want to kill your team with four tough ones. But I want to challenge them going into the conference. I want them prepared.

“I think you have to have some good balance on your schedule. But I’m not afraid to play people. I’m not big on playing I-AA teams. People know that."

But it may happen again at NU. Beginning in 2015, the Big Ten is expected to play nine conference games, which means three nonconference games, which means three nonconference games likely at home — at least on the years when NU has only four Big Ten games at home. Seven home games pays the bills, folks.

So take away one nonconference game, combine that with Mountain West, WAC and even MAC teams that want home-and-homes and up to $1 million to do it and you have a scenario in which Jamrog thinks that the Division I-AA schools will become valuable commodities. For instance, NU is paying SDSU just $375,000 in two weeks. Idaho is getting $800,000.

Paging Trev Alberts, please pick up a white courtesy phone. UNO very likely could be Division I-AA in five years. Can you imagine Nebraska vs. UNO?

Like Pelini said, the Huskers don’t duck anyone.

LINK

 
How much is Idaho and South Dakota State getting? What did Western KY get?
So take away one nonconference game, combine that with Mountain West, WAC and even MAC teams that want home-and-homes and up to $1 million to do it and you have a scenario in which Jamrog thinks that the Division I-AA schools will become valuable commodities. For instance, NU is paying SDSU just $375,000 in two weeks. Idaho is getting $800,000

Not sure what WKU got.

 
So take away one nonconference game, combine that with Mountain West, WAC and even MAC teams that want home-and-homes and up to $1 million to do it and you have a scenario in which Jamrog thinks that the Division I-AA schools will become valuable commodities. For instance, NU is paying SDSU just $375,000 in two weeks. Idaho is getting $800,000
Not sure what WKU got.
They got a whoopin'.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So take away one nonconference game, combine that with Mountain West, WAC and even MAC teams that want home-and-homes and up to $1 million to do it and you have a scenario in which Jamrog thinks that the Division I-AA schools will become valuable commodities. For instance, NU is paying SDSU just $375,000 in two weeks. Idaho is getting $800,000
Not sure what WKU got.
They got a whoopin'.
:LOLtartar True story

 
So take away one nonconference game, combine that with Mountain West, WAC and even MAC teams that want home-and-homes and up to $1 million to do it and you have a scenario in which Jamrog thinks that the Division I-AA schools will become valuable commodities. For instance, NU is paying SDSU just $375,000 in two weeks. Idaho is getting $800,000
Not sure what WKU got.
They got a whoopin'.
Word!!!

 
How much is Idaho and South Dakota State getting? What did Western KY get?
They'll all get a decent sum of money (around the $1,000,000 mark). The fact of the matter is that Boise State (at least in our situation) is trying to get top dog status for bottom feeder money, and that's not how it works. You don't pay bigger schools big time money to play you. That is reserved for the weaker almost "guaranteed" wins.

Which to me is interesting, especially when you consider if one of these teams ever actually wins (a la Appalachian State vs. Michigan). They probably got a ridiculously sum of money AND beat one of the most prestigious programs in the country. Not bad for a days work.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
2014: at Fresno State; Miami (Fla.).
2015: at Miami (Fla.), Southern Miss.

2016: Fresno State, Tennessee, Wyoming.
Can't wait to see us play the U and Tenn again. Those games are gonna be huge!

 
I am looking forward to playing some of our B12 brethren as nonconf games in the future. Especially Mizzou, OU and Tejas. And maybe KU instead of a FCS game. :)

 
There’s been some bold talk this week out of the Boise State camp of supporters. Nobody in a big-boy conference will play Boise. You think that you can beat the Broncos? Give them a call. We dare you.
Nebraska called. Nebraska tried.

In the past year, NU tried to put together a series with BSU; two-for-one, home-and-home, one-way trip to Lincoln. Whatever. It ended up fizzling out. Why?

Because, according to NU Assistant Athletic Director Jeff Jamrog, Boise wanted a minimum $1 million to play in Lincoln.

Geez, no wonder the Broncos can’t get anyone to play them. Pay Boise State $1 million to come to your town? Sorry, don’t want it that bad.

Imagine if that game had come together. Next fall, Nebraska would have played host to Boise State, Fresno State and Washington, and played at Wyoming — before the Big Ten Welcoming Committee opened its arms.

The days of cupcake diets are over at Memorial Stadium. Many Husker fans are glad. They want some protein. They’re going to get it.

Enjoy this year’s menu of Western Kentucky, Idaho and South Dakota State (Football Championship Subdivision) — or not. You might see one or two FCS (formerly known as I-AA) teams in the future, which might be good news for the University of Nebraska at Omaha. More on that later.

Tom Osborne and Bo Pelini don’t want to comment on this year’s nonconference schedule, former Athletic Director Steve Pederson’s last legacy at Nebraska. Their actions said enough.

Beginning next season, Nebraska football has a new nutritionist. Whether that’s good for the long-term health of the program remains to be seen. But it won’t be dull. And the days of cheap jokes aimed at Nebraska’s schedules should be long gone.

2011: Fresno State, Washington, at Wyoming and an opponent that Jamrog says he is close to signing.

2012: Southern Miss, at UCLA.

2013: Wyoming, at Southern Miss, UCLA.

2014: at Fresno State; Miami (Fla.).

2015: at Miami (Fla.), Southern Miss.

2016: Fresno State, Tennessee, Wyoming.

It should be noted that Washington and UCLA were made on Pederson’s watch. But filling in around them with salty Fresno State and dangerous Southern Miss is downright crazy — and bold. Put it as the precursor to Ohio State, Wisconsin, Michigan and Penn State and it’s a guarantee to either knock you out of national title contention or lock you in.

A word about the recently released Big Ten schedule: Most Nebraska fans I hear from love it. They want the big names and the big games, the more the better. And, let’s face it, it won’t always be heavy lifting.

Sure the Big Ten has some meat this year. But two years ago, the Big 12 was the rage with the quarterbacks and the Top 25 teams. And the Big Ten looked soft. Who knows what it will look like in two years?

You can win the national title with a difficult schedule. A team from the Southeastern Conference — widely known as the best in the business — has done it the past four years.

SEC teams get a rap for piling on the cupcakes in the nonconference, though. Is it true?

The 2006 Florida Gators played Western Carolina, Southern Miss, Florida State and Central Florida. In 2007, national champ LSU played Virginia Tech, Middle Tennessee, Tulane and Louisiana Tech. In 2008, Florida had Hawaii, Miami (Fla.), The Citadel and Florida State. Last year, Alabama played Virginia Tech, Florida International, North Texas and Tennessee-Chattanooga.

Nebraska’s future September roads are a notch above those. But Pelini likes what he’s got.

“Next year is just about right," Pelini said. “You don’t want to kill your team with four tough ones. But I want to challenge them going into the conference. I want them prepared.

“I think you have to have some good balance on your schedule. But I’m not afraid to play people. I’m not big on playing I-AA teams. People know that."

But it may happen again at NU. Beginning in 2015, the Big Ten is expected to play nine conference games, which means three nonconference games, which means three nonconference games likely at home — at least on the years when NU has only four Big Ten games at home. Seven home games pays the bills, folks.

So take away one nonconference game, combine that with Mountain West, WAC and even MAC teams that want home-and-homes and up to $1 million to do it and you have a scenario in which Jamrog thinks that the Division I-AA schools will become valuable commodities. For instance, NU is paying SDSU just $375,000 in two weeks. Idaho is getting $800,000.

Paging Trev Alberts, please pick up a white courtesy phone. UNO very likely could be Division I-AA in five years. Can you imagine Nebraska vs. UNO?

Like Pelini said, the Huskers don’t duck anyone.

LINK
Good stuff Nexus!

That match up with Miami will be huge. Shannon has the U on their way back to prominence again.

 
Enhance89 said:
BOskers said:
How much is Idaho and South Dakota State getting? What did Western KY get?
They'll all get a decent some of money (around the $1,000,000 mark). The fact of the matter is that Boise State (at least in our situation) is trying to get top dog status for bottom feeder money, and that's not how it works. You don't pay bigger schools big time money to play you. That is reserved for the weaker almost "guaranteed" wins.

Which to me is interesting, especially when you consider if one of these teams ever actually wins (a la Appalachian State vs. Michigan). They probably got a ridiculously sum of money AND beat one of the most prestigious programs in the country. Not bad for a days work.
But if we pay $800,000 to Idaho, why not pay Boise St. $1,000,000? I don't see the big problem here. If it was a ton of money more than others were asking, then I could see it.

 
Enhance89 said:
BOskers said:
How much is Idaho and South Dakota State getting? What did Western KY get?
They'll all get a decent some of money (around the $1,000,000 mark). The fact of the matter is that Boise State (at least in our situation) is trying to get top dog status for bottom feeder money, and that's not how it works. You don't pay bigger schools big time money to play you. That is reserved for the weaker almost "guaranteed" wins.

Which to me is interesting, especially when you consider if one of these teams ever actually wins (a la Appalachian State vs. Michigan). They probably got a ridiculously sum of money AND beat one of the most prestigious programs in the country. Not bad for a days work.
But if we pay $800,000 to Idaho, why not pay Boise St. $1,000,000? I don't see the big problem here. If it was a ton of money more than others were asking, then I could see it.
Interestingly enough, about a month after negotiations fell through between Nebraska and Boise, Ole Miss promptly offered to play Boise for 900k and Boise accepted.

With that in mind, my guess is we probably offered Boise the same amount we're offering Idaho, but Boise turned it down. They probably wanted $1 million or nothing. Yet they took Ole Miss up on 900k, so... :dunno

 
knapplc said:
NU41SB said:
So take away one nonconference game, combine that with Mountain West, WAC and even MAC teams that want home-and-homes and up to $1 million to do it and you have a scenario in which Jamrog thinks that the Division I-AA schools will become valuable commodities. For instance, NU is paying SDSU just $375,000 in two weeks. Idaho is getting $800,000
Not sure what WKU got.
They got a whoopin'.
:laughpound Yes, yes they did.

 
Enhance89 said:
The fact of the matter is that Boise State (at least in our situation) is trying to get top dog status for bottom feeder money, and that's not how it works. You don't pay bigger schools big time money to play you. That is reserved for the weaker almost "guaranteed" wins.
I don't understand that either. Boise wants to be taken seriously and be put in a BCS bowl for their accomplishments, but then want huge money for away games, like they're a bottom feeder.

 
Back
Top