Haha okay, I wrote my post in a very clunky way as I tried to spit out a lot of ideas in a couple of sentences. But yes, what you wrote!Good call. I like the idea of looking at our opponents penalty total versus NU as compared to their other B12 officiated games.This isn't really the interesting statistic-- I think it would be more interesting to look at the calls made by that officiating crew or ALL opponent penalties vs against NU; or all penalties by the teams played the very penalty-lopsided games vs their penalties against NU.
Looking at penalties called against NU is a sketchy way to go; even in the discussions about the A&M game, most nu fans had to admit that most of the 16 calls were legit. Now, it's hard to go back and verify non calls, but it is possible to show how statistically anomalous some of our opponents have been in terms of penalties called compared to all of their other performances.
I guess I'll just have to call to reactivate SPSS tomorrow(I hate that they adopted an activation scheme there)

I didn't meant to be that dismissive of the original analysis, either. I meant "not interesting" more in that it wasn't as useful for formulating an objective argument... of course it IS interesting
