I looked it up. In the time span you mentioned, Wisconsin is 1-3 with a first-year starter at QB playing a top 15 team at Camp Randall.JTrain said:Ok, but none of this addresses the loss of Tolzien. How many of those 32 wins were with a first year starter at QB and against a top 15 team?IAhusker said:Camp Randall is one of the toughest places to play. The badgers are 32-4 in Camp Randall since they completed their stadium renovations to add seats, and make the visiting locker rooms a lot less opponent friendly. That plus three solid running backs lead me to believe the Huskers are going to have to play a perfect game to win there.JTrain said:I fail to see how Wisconsin is a guaranteed loss. I know people characterize Wisconsin as a pound-it-down-your-throat running team, but Scott Tolzien has really been the catalyst to making the offense great this year. He just won the Unitas Award and leads the country in completion percentage. Losing him will hurt no matter how you slice it.IAhusker said:@Wisconsin is a loss, Ohio State and Michigan State are toss ups. Minnesota is the only guaranteed W. Iowa and Penn St are games that should be wins. Michigan and Northwestern are games Nebraska will be favored in, but it comes down to whether or not the blackshirts can stop Robinson and Persa respectively. 6-2 would be a great first season in my opinion.
What did they do to the opposing locker rooms at Camp Randall?
Count me among those who are concerned about defending the run in the Big 10 w/ an undersized defense. I'm sure they'll figure something out in the offseason, but I expect some culture shock to a degree.
I am starting to wonder how effective the Big 10 defenses will be against NU's speed, though. "Big" defenses are rarely "fast" defenses.
JTrain said:Hardest
Ohio State
Wisconsin
Michigan St.
Iowa
Michigan (without Greg Robinson)
Penn St.
Northwestern
Michigan (with Greg Robinson)
Minnesota
Easiest
I know this is fun and what forum boards are all about, but how could anyone possibly have any confidence in what product is going to show up on the field week to week. Losses to a horrid Texas, average A&M, beatable OU and one point win over ISU.
No Gomes, Price, Hagg or Henery?
I think we will see a lot of the same next year.
You think that if Martinez gets hurt next year we will be near any 10-2 record?I know this is fun and what forum boards are all about, but how could anyone possibly have any confidence in what product is going to show up on the field week to week. Losses to a horrid Texas, average A&M, beatable OU and one point win over ISU.
No Gomes, Price, Hagg or Henery?
I think we will see a lot of the same next year.
A lot of the same meaning 10-2 and heading to Indianapolis? Sounds fine with me.
Words of caution to the Big 10. NU will play for the conference title next year. I will not go on record to say NU will win it but I say we play for the title. NU will have a dynamic QB that will run wild but have a defense that can play with the most elite teams in the country.
Put Bo's defense with Dennard at Michigan. The would be an elite team.
The alignments for the new divisions, which have yet to be named, are as follows:
– Illinois, Indiana, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue and Wisconsin in one division.
– Iowa, Michigan, Michigan State, Minnesota, Nebraska and Northwestern in the other.
I see NU playing either OSU or Wisc. If Pryor returns for his senior year OSU will have a slight advantage over
Wisc based on Wisc losing their QB. I just don't see much Carne in the bolded division above. Sorry Wolvie, NU plays for the title of the Big 10 in their first year.