Just because we have players with a criminal record doesn't mean we do not run a clean program (that goes for every program). I am a strong believer that through structure and good coaches it partly the programs job to reform these athletes. The whole idea is to turn these boys into men by giving them the tools to succeed. Every program is going to have "bad" kids and i would agree that having to many "bad" kids is a bad thing for the program, but hopefully the program turns them into success stories.I coworker brought this to my attention today I thought it was interesting that Nebraska had 4 players with criminal record. I guess that isn't very many but I always thought we ran a pretty clean program. I’m interested to know who the guys are and what they got in trouble for.
My link
I guess I worded that wrong. I didn't think we would be above texas and LSU on the list.Just because we have players with a criminal record doesn't mean we do not run a clean program (that goes for every program). I am a strong believer that through structure and good coaches it partly the programs job to reform these athletes. The whole idea is to turn these boys into men by giving them the tools to succeed. Every program is going to have "bad" kids and i would agree that having to many "bad" kids is a bad thing for the program, but hopefully the program turns them into success stories.I coworker brought this to my attention today I thought it was interesting that Nebraska had 4 players with criminal record. I guess that isn't very many but I always thought we ran a pretty clean program. I’m interested to know who the guys are and what they got in trouble for.
My link
And yeah we have had DUI's, and drug and assault problems in the past. IMO nothing that isn't to be expected sadly.
Agreed. Plus it's appropriate to mention that we have 100+ guys on the team counting walk-ons, so four guys with criminal "issues" is pretty low - at or less than 4%. About 6.5% of Americans have a criminal record (the UK and Canada are at about 10%), so Nebraska Football is below the national average.Just because we have players with a criminal record doesn't mean we do not run a clean program (that goes for every program). I am a strong believer that through structure and good coaches it partly the programs job to reform these athletes. The whole idea is to turn these boys into men by giving them the tools to succeed. Every program is going to have "bad" kids and i would agree that having to many "bad" kids is a bad thing for the program, but hopefully the program turns them into success stories.
And yeah we have had DUI's, and drug and assault problems in the past. IMO nothing that isn't to be expected sadly.
Yeah I would agree. I thought for sure Texas would be up there. I am surprised Stanford would even let a person with a criminal record on campus unless it happened after he enrolled.I guess I worded that wrong. I didn't think we would be above texas and LSU on the list.Just because we have players with a criminal record doesn't mean we do not run a clean program (that goes for every program). I am a strong believer that through structure and good coaches it partly the programs job to reform these athletes. The whole idea is to turn these boys into men by giving them the tools to succeed. Every program is going to have "bad" kids and i would agree that having to many "bad" kids is a bad thing for the program, but hopefully the program turns them into success stories.I coworker brought this to my attention today I thought it was interesting that Nebraska had 4 players with criminal record. I guess that isn't very many but I always thought we ran a pretty clean program. I’m interested to know who the guys are and what they got in trouble for.
My link
And yeah we have had DUI's, and drug and assault problems in the past. IMO nothing that isn't to be expected sadly.
Some of the follow up articles go into a little more detail on the percentages of violent crimes versus misdemenors. Also remember that these background checks generally did not include juvi records, so the numbers could be higher.Agreed. Plus it's appropriate to mention that we have 100+ guys on the team counting walk-ons, so four guys with criminal "issues" is pretty low - at or less than 4%. About 6.5% of Americans have a criminal record (the UK and Canada are at about 10%), so Nebraska Football is below the national average.
Further, this article does a poor job of differentiating between crimes. All crimes are not the same, and four guys with misdemeanors are far different than four guys with felonies. If they really want to show me "striking revelations," they need to tell me what those crimes are.
They launch the article with four tales of pretty sordid behavior by Pitt players, then they lump DUI with "intent to distribute cocaine." Those are two VERY different crimes.
The article seems to be an attempt to blow the lid off of something - but they didn't find much of much, so they tossed out some anecdotes about some of the more serious offenders, lumping all "police records" into one category, then ended with some vague worry about "where this is all going."
I think this article had far less impact than they intended. But whatever.
Yeah, no kidding. If you stopped 100 people on the street, I bet more than 4 of them would pull a gun and shoot you.Who cares......Thats less than 4% of the team. Its gonna happen. If you stopped 100 people on the street, I would bet more than 4 of them would have some sort of criminal record and likely alot worse than that of the players on our team.
Ha ha! This assumes TCU alums can write.The article was obviously written by a TCU alum.