Report: Florida State discussing move to SEC
- Thread starter The Dude
- Start date
huskersrule95
All-Conference
I don't see that happening. I think Florida State has just as big if not bigger rivalry with Miami than they do with Florida and wouldn't want to lose that matchup. I also don't think Florida would want Florida St in SEC with the recruiting implications.
VectorVictor
Heisman Trophy Winner
Nope. Don't see Florida State, and if you don't see Florida State, then you can't see Clemson or Ga. Tech being a candidate for the same reasons.
I think they go further north and get someone that's outside the footprint--like I said elsewhere, Maryland and Missouri doesn't set your heart a racin' when it comes to sports prowess...but if you're wearing your television network hats, the addition of either footprint to the Texas footprint would make your heart go pitter-pat.
I think they go further north and get someone that's outside the footprint--like I said elsewhere, Maryland and Missouri doesn't set your heart a racin' when it comes to sports prowess...but if you're wearing your television network hats, the addition of either footprint to the Texas footprint would make your heart go pitter-pat.
redblooded
Special Teams Player
Florida State is smart, they see where this is eventually going and want a seat in the league they rebuffed years ago because the competition was stiffer. Gone are the days when "easiest league to win" will be the driving force behind top football schools.
There's only so many chairs and the 3 leagues that will be around when the music stops for sure are the Pac, B1G and SEC. Everything else is unknown.
Last edited by a moderator:
It'sNotAFakeID
All-American
A team that could compliment the addition of Texas A&M in the West could be the addition of Virginia Tech in the East. It adds a completely new TV market, as Georgia Tech has Georgia, Clemson has South Carolina, and Florida State has Florida. Plus, Virginia Tech is a competitive team, Clemson, Ga Tech aren't. Using my 1st reason (TV Market), Virginia Tech seems like the best possible candidate to me.
gratefullred
Special Teams Player
Missouri gets stood up again.
huskerfan92
All-Conference
I don't know where you're getting this idea that FSU's rivalry with Miami is bigger than that with Florida. Do you live in Florida? Because all I hear around here from FSU fans is the Florida-FSU matchup, it's huge. Hardly ever do I hear about Miami-FSU.
gratefullred
Special Teams Player
I think the fact that the Big10 invited NU proves that TV footprint does not drive expansion. The Big10 chose the Nebraska market over the New Jersey/NYC market. FSU moves the dial more than Missouri or Maryland. Which game would you watch FSU vs LSU or Maryland vs Florida?
Why would FSU go the the SEC? $$$$$
I think it is a done deal, and now the ACC needs one more team and I don't think they have more the offer than the Big East when the Big East is negotiating a new primary rights deal.
Why would FSU go the the SEC? $$$$$
I think it is a done deal, and now the ACC needs one more team and I don't think they have more the offer than the Big East when the Big East is negotiating a new primary rights deal.
OmahaPlaya
All-Conference
I'm thinking with Miami having been down for awhile the rivalry between them and FSU has cooled off significantly since the Wide Right or Left games of lore.
Nebula
Starter
I have to disagree with that man. Nebraska has a huge, huge TV footprint. We're one of the top draws nationally. No question adding Nebraska adds a whole bunch of eyeballs to the BTN.
If you're talking about local, regional populace than I can maybe see your point. But we're a national program. Fans in every state. That's a big footprint.
Last edited by a moderator:
okaive
All-Conference
Agree with nebula. NU has a following in every state. I live in OKC and I see a minimum of 5 Husker tags at my work's parking lot and I am always talking to fans that are wearing the gear at restaurants.
Just look at the BTN thread and how many people out of state are asking about getting the games. NU is huge national and the Big10 knew it and that was one of the major reasons the vote was quick to add us.
Just look at the BTN thread and how many people out of state are asking about getting the games. NU is huge national and the Big10 knew it and that was one of the major reasons the vote was quick to add us.
gratefullred
Special Teams Player
I agree NU is a national draw and that is why NU got into the Big10 over MU, Rutgers, or anyone else. NU does not have the regional "footprint" that is always talked about in expansion. It was the point I was trying to make, and the reason FSU would be more desireable than Missouri or Maryland.
IlliniHusker
Five-Star Recruit
When it comes to TV draw, NU is unique. I'm a Husker Alum and have lived in Illinois for 40 years. I've run into many people who watch the Big Red on TV and follow NU football and have never lived in Nebraska or attended school there. Strongly suspect that the same phenomena exists in many other states.
Scarlet Overkill
All-Conference
Pennsylvanians for Nebraska is alive and very well. It may dwindle some now that there won't be any more PPV to get together for, but I'm definitely going to attend for some of the bigger games.
VectorVictor
Heisman Trophy Winner
That's not correct. Ratings and footprint, in that order, drive these decisions. It's a one-two punch--you get national brands that everyone wants to see, but then you get a large local base to show it in, as that's the money that keeps the lights on in your conference.
Plus, there's no cap to your ad rates--the better your conference gets, the higher the rates go, and the more money you make. And you can soak your footprint areas (sometimes 5x) more than you do non-footprint areas for ad rates.
With the Big 10, they got a ratings-grabber in Nebraska. One of the next two Big 10 expansion targets will need to significantly expand the local footprint (e.g. Rutgers and NY/NJ, Maryland and DC/Baltimore), and the other can be another 'national brand' (e.g. Kansas, Notre Dame)
With the SEC and Florida State, you have a different set of circumstances: Florida likely doesn't want to compete against FSU any more than they are, and Florida State doesn't expand the footprint--the SEC is already in the whole of Florida.
From a media market standpoint, that's why Missouri makes sense--they're net new markets that would go along great with the Houston and 1/2 of the San Antonio market they'll get. Forget that Missouri plays substandard sports--they still get TV sets in major metropolitan areas.
I'd wager the only way we'll see FSU (or Clemson/Ga. Tech) getting a SEC invite is if they break down and go to 16 teams. With the exception of Maryland, they will have expanded into all of the contiguous markets available and added two marquee names.
Last edited by a moderator: