:lol:I missed the part where Shapiro is only 5'5" ...that is fantastic
Also consider the man who lectured USC as the head of the infractions committee about "high-profile athletes demand high-profile compliance" and was pushing for harsher punishments was the AD at Miami while this was going on.The problem with the whole SMU argument is that I don't believe that's the most relevant precedent. The most relevant precedent is USC. USC, who we'll all remember was slammed to the tune of 30 schollies and two years without a bowl, the harshest penalty in recent memory. What USC did looks like playing Candy Land past bedtime compared to the U's antics.
Forget which was worse, SMU or Miami. Just look at the infractions, the length, the breadth, and the depth of them. Consider that they are now repeat violators. To me the Death Penalty is the only punishment fitting this kind of corruption. When you have a handful of coaches and dozens of players involved for the better part of a decade, what else is just? You couldn't strip enough schollies to make it fair after what they did to USC.
And remember, Florida is a reddish state--these words tend to exacerbate things in such locations.But people tend to have a recency bias, and seeing the words "prostitutes" "strip clubs" and "abortion" tends to inflate the severity of this stuff in people's minds.
How many players got USC their penalties? http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/d28c898042cdd2bc958fd5a6e282e000/20100610+USC+Public+Report.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=d28c898042cdd2bc958fd5a6e282e000And remember, Florida is a reddish state--these words tend to exacerbate things in such locations.But people tend to have a recency bias, and seeing the words "prostitutes" "strip clubs" and "abortion" tends to inflate the severity of this stuff in people's minds.
---
Also, people keep bringing up the USC debacle, but how many players were ever implicated in that mess, and for how many years? I thought it was only (only!) twenty or so players over Pete's reign.
If I'm remembering correctly, USC's infractions would be small potatoes compared to what Yahoo Sports dug up on Miami.
Plus, let's look at it this way--would giving the death penalty to Miami kill the ACC in either the short or long term? Probably not, especially with expansion on the horizon.
USC getting the death penalty...that's more of a linchpin program for the Pac-12, and it's temporary removal would likely cause the Pac-12 to collapse in on itself. Ohio State, same thing.
Even though it shouldn't be, I'm sure the program's importance to the conference is being taken into account here...and Miami really isn't all that special to the ACC, and Miami has willingly played the villain since the 80s.
This alone makes them the perfect program to make an example of.
I am a little bias, but I have to say, what "allegedly" happened at Miami and Auburn and what did happen at SMU and Oklahoma aren't even in the same ballpark as what happened at OSU.We could be sitting here thinking about how we Just won this title or that title.... not to say that Nebraska was innocent of all wrong doing during the glory years.... but overall nothing remotely close to auburn Ohio St. Miami smu ou. I'm proud to say overall things were done the right way at Nebraska.
Sorry to quote my own reply, but what I mean by that is: players selling their own property for nominal money and what occurred at these other schools is not comparable; at least not from a homer's point of view. Me selling my own trophy and you paying me money because I play football are two different things, at the end of the day in the first scenario, you got something in return for the money a trophy that has value and I originally owned it, in the second you got nothing in return except a future hand in my pocket. Huge difference.I am a little bias, but I have to say, what "allegedly" happened at Miami and Auburn and what did happen at SMU and Oklahoma aren't even in the same ballpark as what happened at OSU.We could be sitting here thinking about how we Just won this title or that title.... not to say that Nebraska was innocent of all wrong doing during the glory years.... but overall nothing remotely close to auburn Ohio St. Miami smu ou. I'm proud to say overall things were done the right way at Nebraska.
Yet, we have judges that do that very thing in our legal system--they weight punishment against the crime, impact to dependents/innocents, and the defendant's importance, political climate (if the judges are voted on), among other factors.How many players got USC their penalties? http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/d28c898042cdd2bc958fd5a6e282e000/20100610+USC+Public+Report.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=d28c898042cdd2bc958fd5a6e282e000And remember, Florida is a reddish state--these words tend to exacerbate things in such locations.But people tend to have a recency bias, and seeing the words "prostitutes" "strip clubs" and "abortion" tends to inflate the severity of this stuff in people's minds.
---
Also, people keep bringing up the USC debacle, but how many players were ever implicated in that mess, and for how many years? I thought it was only (only!) twenty or so players over Pete's reign.
If I'm remembering correctly, USC's infractions would be small potatoes compared to what Yahoo Sports dug up on Miami.
Plus, let's look at it this way--would giving the death penalty to Miami kill the ACC in either the short or long term? Probably not, especially with expansion on the horizon.
USC getting the death penalty...that's more of a linchpin program for the Pac-12, and it's temporary removal would likely cause the Pac-12 to collapse in on itself. Ohio State, same thing.
Even though it shouldn't be, I'm sure the program's importance to the conference is being taken into account here...and Miami really isn't all that special to the ACC, and Miami has willingly played the villain since the 80s.
This alone makes them the perfect program to make an example of.
(A) 2.
When you start doling out punishment because of someones status as a powerhouse (or not) in a conference you lose legitimacy as an impartial enforcement body. Which is already thought of as arbitrary in it's enforcement. More of that would be bad.
So... does this mean we'll be seeing penalties to Miami sooner rather than later? And why are currently active players named by the Yahoo! article like Jacory Harris, among others, still practicing with the team?NCAA President Mark Emmert responds to Miami allegations
If the assertions are true, the alleged conduct at the University of Miami is an illustration of the need for serious and fundamental change in many critical aspects of college sports. This pertains especially to the involvement of boosters and agents with student-athletes. While many are hearing about this case for the first time, the NCAA has been investigating the matter for five months. The serious threats to the integrity of college sports are one of the key reasons why I called together more than 50 presidents and chancellors last week to drive substantive changes to Division I intercollegiate athletics.