First half kick catch interference

[flatwaterfan]

Hard to tell. I would call it inconclusive. It could of but then it might not of....

 

[beanman]

Someone should just start a poll about whether or not the ball hit the Washington player's foot. Count me in the "yes" category...

Someone should post a gif of a couple angles. I didn't DVR it so I have no chance to re-watch it. Even if it did hit his foot, the officials did look pretty damn shaky so I hope they don't screw us over later in the conference play. I don't think they did anything on purpose yesterday, I just think they were that bad.

 

[T_O_Bull]

Watched the replay several times and IMHO the ball hit a Wash. player first. Good call. As for the announcers... the only good thing Millen ever did was play LB for the Raiders then he practically destroyed the Lions. As for the other guy... he needs to wear a hat when he goes out in the sun. ABC has gone from Keith "Whoa Nelly" Jackson to a bunch of NFL has beens who shouldn't even be allowed on a college campus much less commenting on a game.

T_O_B

G_B_R

 

[kyle sibert]

It's the best pic I could get. It looks like it hit the Washington player first.

 

[I am I]

i was in the N endzone, saw it w my own eyes. it hit the W player first, you can tell by the bounce

 

[beanman]

It's the best pic I could get. It looks like it hit the Washington player first.

That's Marlowe's foot on the left?

 

[beanman]

Why don't we put Turner back there on punt returns? Does he have issues with securing the ball?

 

[kyle sibert]

It's the best pic I could get. It looks like it hit the Washington player first.

That's Marlowe's foot on the left?

On the left is #31 from Wash.

 

[The Dude]

It's the best pic I could get. It looks like it hit the Washington player first.

If you look close enough you can see sasquatch also.

 

[kyle sibert]

If you look close enough you can see sasquatch also.

"Back, and to the left. Back, and to the left."

 

[notgoodatmath]

:koolaid2: yes I see it!!1 Good call!!1

 

[Rep The 402]

Well that my misunderstanding then, people kept telling me it was an onside kick. But like i said, either way we had the ball, and no matter where we were, the offense would have moved the ball.

The ball has to touch the ground for it to be an onside kick for the other team to touch the ball. Therefore the ball never touched the ground it was kicked straight up. Therefore, he interfered.

 

[irafreak]

I went by the bounce as well IamI. It looked like it changed right before it hit the ground. I'm not trying to stretch here. I just call it like I see it because I don't think it really changed the game as much as Washington would like to believe.

 

[brasky]

I was in the 3rd row in the north endzone and it looked to me like Marlowe got brushed by the Washington player. It was slight, but technically interference.

 

[BigWillie]

You can, Watch the reverse angle they show after the half.

Watched the reverse angle many times, and am watching it again currently. No way you can see from that angle, without a biased opinion of course , any type of contact from the UDub player.