Axl_sued_me
Starter
I know that he got hurt last night, but when I re-watched the game last night, the announcers were talking about how he's "not the same player since the concussion''. Were they over reacting? Or is there some concern there?
Yes he does. His play has mostly been pretty good this season for what he is asked to do. But at times last night he was literally taking on triple teams without giving ground, I think he's fine.I heard he was unconscious for half the game last night. That's how good he is. He can play that well unconscious, I can't wait til' he wakes up. On a serious note, I hope the kid is doing okay. He is 100% born and raised Husker, and that means more to me than anything. The dude plays his butt off regardless.
He's fine. He's just not as good as everyone thinks he is. We are now realizing just how much he benefited from playing next to Suh.
I'm sick of hearing every broadcast announcer covering our game all over Crick's jock. They're always like, "one of the best DT's in the country" etc, etc. Just heaping praise on him. For what? He hasn't done a damn thing this year. He had one good season (next to one of the greatest DT's to ever play the game) and people think he's good.
If he was as good as advertised, he'd be taking up double teams and allowing the DT next to him to make plays. If he was really good, he would be taking up double teams and still making plays. But he's not good and neither of those scenarios are taking place.
You rarely hear his name called and I usually only notice him when he's whiffing on a sack or tackling the RB that squirted past him because he got blown off the ball.
Are you trying to say he is playing Suh-like football right now?He's fine. He's just not as good as everyone thinks he is. We are now realizing just how much he benefited from playing next to Suh.
I'm sick of hearing every broadcast announcer covering our game all over Crick's jock. They're always like, "one of the best DT's in the country" etc, etc. Just heaping praise on him. For what? He hasn't done a damn thing this year. He had one good season (next to one of the greatest DT's to ever play the game) and people think he's good.
If he was as good as advertised, he'd be taking up double teams and allowing the DT next to him to make plays. If he was really good, he would be taking up double teams and still making plays. But he's not good and neither of those scenarios are taking place.
You rarely hear his name called and I usually only notice him when he's whiffing on a sack or tackling the RB that squirted past him because he got blown off the ball.
Jared Crick's Sophomore Year
73 tackles
15 tackles for loss
9.5 sacks
Jared Crick's Junior Year (WITHOUT Suh)
70 tackles
17 tackles for loss
9.5 sacks
Ndamukong Suh's Sophomore Year
34 tackles
6 tackles for loss
1 sack
Ndamukong Suh's Junior Year (Compare it to Crick's junior year, yeah?)
76 tackles
19 tackles for loss
7.5 sacks
What was that you were saying?
i would be interested in seeing their senior season comparison through 6 games if they are readily available.He's fine. He's just not as good as everyone thinks he is. We are now realizing just how much he benefited from playing next to Suh.
I'm sick of hearing every broadcast announcer covering our game all over Crick's jock. They're always like, "one of the best DT's in the country" etc, etc. Just heaping praise on him. For what? He hasn't done a damn thing this year. He had one good season (next to one of the greatest DT's to ever play the game) and people think he's good.
If he was as good as advertised, he'd be taking up double teams and allowing the DT next to him to make plays. If he was really good, he would be taking up double teams and still making plays. But he's not good and neither of those scenarios are taking place.
You rarely hear his name called and I usually only notice him when he's whiffing on a sack or tackling the RB that squirted past him because he got blown off the ball.
Jared Crick's Sophomore Year
73 tackles
15 tackles for loss
9.5 sacks
Jared Crick's Junior Year (WITHOUT Suh)
70 tackles
17 tackles for loss
9.5 sacks
Ndamukong Suh's Sophomore Year
34 tackles
6 tackles for loss
1 sack
Ndamukong Suh's Junior Year (Compare it to Crick's junior year, yeah?)
76 tackles
19 tackles for loss
7.5 sacks
What was that you were saying?
This.Are you trying to say he is playing Suh-like football right now?He's fine. He's just not as good as everyone thinks he is. We are now realizing just how much he benefited from playing next to Suh.
I'm sick of hearing every broadcast announcer covering our game all over Crick's jock. They're always like, "one of the best DT's in the country" etc, etc. Just heaping praise on him. For what? He hasn't done a damn thing this year. He had one good season (next to one of the greatest DT's to ever play the game) and people think he's good.
If he was as good as advertised, he'd be taking up double teams and allowing the DT next to him to make plays. If he was really good, he would be taking up double teams and still making plays. But he's not good and neither of those scenarios are taking place.
You rarely hear his name called and I usually only notice him when he's whiffing on a sack or tackling the RB that squirted past him because he got blown off the ball.
Jared Crick's Sophomore Year
73 tackles
15 tackles for loss
9.5 sacks
Jared Crick's Junior Year (WITHOUT Suh)
70 tackles
17 tackles for loss
9.5 sacks
Ndamukong Suh's Sophomore Year
34 tackles
6 tackles for loss
1 sack
Ndamukong Suh's Junior Year (Compare it to Crick's junior year, yeah?)
76 tackles
19 tackles for loss
7.5 sacks
What was that you were saying?
He won't even be all conference let alone all-american.
If we torture the stats long enough they will tell us anything we want.