Landlord
Banned
This.Are you trying to say he is playing Suh-like football right now?He's fine. He's just not as good as everyone thinks he is. We are now realizing just how much he benefited from playing next to Suh.
I'm sick of hearing every broadcast announcer covering our game all over Crick's jock. They're always like, "one of the best DT's in the country" etc, etc. Just heaping praise on him. For what? He hasn't done a damn thing this year. He had one good season (next to one of the greatest DT's to ever play the game) and people think he's good.
If he was as good as advertised, he'd be taking up double teams and allowing the DT next to him to make plays. If he was really good, he would be taking up double teams and still making plays. But he's not good and neither of those scenarios are taking place.
You rarely hear his name called and I usually only notice him when he's whiffing on a sack or tackling the RB that squirted past him because he got blown off the ball.
Jared Crick's Sophomore Year
73 tackles
15 tackles for loss
9.5 sacks
Jared Crick's Junior Year (WITHOUT Suh)
70 tackles
17 tackles for loss
9.5 sacks
Ndamukong Suh's Sophomore Year
34 tackles
6 tackles for loss
1 sack
Ndamukong Suh's Junior Year (Compare it to Crick's junior year, yeah?)
76 tackles
19 tackles for loss
7.5 sacks
What was that you were saying?
He won't even be all conference let alone all-american.
If we torture the stats long enough they will tell us anything we want.
Who cares about the stats. Do you notice Crick at all when you watch games? He's irrelevant. He's supposed to be a leader on the d-line this year and he's playing like garbage. Let me ask why you conveniently neglected to put his stats from this year up? Because they're horrible? You ignore the stats that counter your point and use the ones that serve your interest. That's great logic.
2011 (yes he missed one game due to concussion but that doesn't really skew the stats)
Total tackles: 19
Solo tackles: 6
Assisted tackles: 13
Sacks: 1
Tackles for loss: 2.5
As was stated previously, those aren't all-conference stats let alone all-american stats. I'm holding him to a high standard because according to people like you, he should be.
I don't have a dog in this fight, other than to counter your "he had one good year" statement. He had a great year his sophomore year, put up nearly identical numbers and anchored our line his junior year, and started this season off good but not great, and who knows where he's at physically/mentally right now?
I'm not a coach, nor a football guru, so I don't have a definitive statement on how good Jared Crick is doing. For all I know he's doing exactly what the coaches are teaching him to (and another wrong statement by you - he occupies double teams constantly), or maybe he isn't doing anything at all and should be on the bench.