Landomatic
Five-Star Recruit
Creepy.....
Thought it warranted its own thread.
Thought it warranted its own thread.
Last edited by a moderator:
Speaking of Sandusky's lawyer. He choose the right person to represent him. He found a kinship with someone that comes from similar stock. Joe Amendola at the time in his late 40's impregnated at 17 year old girl (who he later married). I'm assuming no charges were filed since he still has his J.D. and the age of consent in PA is 16.Time and show? This is crazyGod only knows why his attorney is letting him do this, but Sandusky is appearing on NBC tonight, interviewed by Bob Costas.
Jerry Sandusky to Bob Costas in exclusive 'Rock Center' interview: "I shouldn't have showered with those kids."
I really don't think I could watch this and not get sick. No explanation suffices for what he did.
WOW this case and the people involved is absolutely ridiculous. Who can we believe anymore, for crying out loud the judge that reduced his bail cant even be trusted!
Sorry, I must be missing something... Did you just compare someone who is being investigated for sexual acts with children who were clearly minors and someone who had sex with and later married a teenager who was legally over the age of consent for that state?Speaking of Sandusky's lawyer. He choose the right person to represent him. He found a kinship with someone that comes from similar stock. Joe Amendola at the time in his late 40's impregnated at 17 year old girl (who he later married). I'm assuming no charges were filed since he still has his J.D. and the age of consent in PA is 16.
Link to the article: http://www.nypost.co...eBlm9RSdr9zeutK
While what Sandusky did was worse, this guy was 48 at the time he got her pregnant. It's understandable that they're compared. Sometimes you have to look past what the law is.Sorry, I must be missing something... Did you just compare someone who is being investigated for sexual acts with children who were clearly minors and someone who had sex with and later married a teenager who was legally over the age of consent for that state?Speaking of Sandusky's lawyer. He choose the right person to represent him. He found a kinship with someone that comes from similar stock. Joe Amendola at the time in his late 40's impregnated at 17 year old girl (who he later married). I'm assuming no charges were filed since he still has his J.D. and the age of consent in PA is 16.
Link to the article: http://www.nypost.co...eBlm9RSdr9zeutK
If I was getting death threats I'd change my story too to make myself look like a hero.So McQueary says he did stop the act in the shower, not physically (though i can't imagine how you can stop something like that without using some kind of physicality). He also states that he told police, which contradicts the reports and testimonies.
Who wants to vote bullpies on McQueary's side of the story? I sure do.
Sorry, I must be missing something... Did you just compare someone who is being investigated for sexual acts with children who were clearly minors and someone who had sex with and later married a teenager who was legally over the age of consent for that state?Speaking of Sandusky's lawyer. He choose the right person to represent him. He found a kinship with someone that comes from similar stock. Joe Amendola at the time in his late 40's impregnated at 17 year old girl (who he later married). I'm assuming no charges were filed since he still has his J.D. and the age of consent in PA is 16.
Link to the article: http://www.nypost.co...eBlm9RSdr9zeutK
When I'm 50 I'll have to do everything without Father support.Sorry, I must be missing something... Did you just compare someone who is being investigated for sexual acts with children who were clearly minors and someone who had sex with and later married a teenager who was legally over the age of consent for that state?Speaking of Sandusky's lawyer. He choose the right person to represent him. He found a kinship with someone that comes from similar stock. Joe Amendola at the time in his late 40's impregnated at 17 year old girl (who he later married). I'm assuming no charges were filed since he still has his J.D. and the age of consent in PA is 16.
Link to the article: http://www.nypost.co...eBlm9RSdr9zeutK
Obviously Mr. Smarty pants you didn't read the WHOLE STORY. So picking up 16 year old girls, when you are 50, with no FATHER or male support, then getting them emancipated from there mother, all because you are a lawyer and you know the LAW, while the mother thought you were a mentor is ok? But its OK? You are pretty sick!!! Yeah lets go shoot bunnies and Bambi with a grenade launcher because its "Legal" pretty brilliant Watson. So you would condone 12 year old boys getting banged by 50 year old guys if that was legal too? You are the kinda of guy who needs the law to tell you how to act. :lame :rollin :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm:
When I'm 50 I'll have to do everything without Father support.Sorry, I must be missing something... Did you just compare someone who is being investigated for sexual acts with children who were clearly minors and someone who had sex with and later married a teenager who was legally over the age of consent for that state?Speaking of Sandusky's lawyer. He choose the right person to represent him. He found a kinship with someone that comes from similar stock. Joe Amendola at the time in his late 40's impregnated at 17 year old girl (who he later married). I'm assuming no charges were filed since he still has his J.D. and the age of consent in PA is 16.
Link to the article: http://www.nypost.co...eBlm9RSdr9zeutK
Obviously Mr. Smarty pants you didn't read the WHOLE STORY. So picking up 16 year old girls, when you are 50, with no FATHER or male support, then getting them emancipated from there mother, all because you are a lawyer and you know the LAW, while the mother thought you were a mentor is ok? But its OK? You are pretty sick!!! Yeah lets go shoot bunnies and Bambi with a grenade launcher because its "Legal" pretty brilliant Watson. So you would condone 12 year old boys getting banged by 50 year old guys if that was legal too? You are the kinda of guy who needs the law to tell you how to act. :lame :rollin :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm:
By no means am I comparing the two events. For starters one is illegal and one is not. The parallel IMO that can be made is they are both morally wrong. When you have a girl that is 16 or 17 she is not near the stage physically or mentally of a 48 year old man. This guy preyed on what the girls mother thought was a mentoring relationship and and had a baby with her. I guess some may find it admirable that a 48 year old man stepped up and did the right thing by marrying a girl that he impregnated out of wedlock that was 17.Sorry, I must be missing something... Did you just compare someone who is being investigated for sexual acts with children who were clearly minors and someone who had sex with and later married a teenager who was legally over the age of consent for that state?Speaking of Sandusky's lawyer. He choose the right person to represent him. He found a kinship with someone that comes from similar stock. Joe Amendola at the time in his late 40's impregnated at 17 year old girl (who he later married). I'm assuming no charges were filed since he still has his J.D. and the age of consent in PA is 16.
Link to the article: http://www.nypost.co...eBlm9RSdr9zeutK