I think many are confusing people's displeasure with certain aspects of Pelini's HC decisions (w/ the exception of 97) as us hating him and not wanting him at Nebraska. If I call Taylor's throwing motion suspect...it doesn't mean I don't think he should be our QB. If I think Bo should have taken a different path with his DC hire, it doesn't mean I think Bo should pack up his office.
It seems like too frequently any discussion that is in any way negative towards Pelini/Martinez, etc gets blown up into a debate that centers on the extremes of both sides (congress?) - rather than an acknowlegement of the obvious: many on here would have liked to have seen Bo go a different route than the promotion of JP if possible, taylor needs to become a better thrower, Bo needs to calm the f' down sometimes. And on the other side, Pelini is doing a solid job, he's returned the "culture" that was so deperately missed post-Cally, he's growin as a coach, etc.
I'm not saying, Bo is a complete idiot for hiring JP and it shows how bad of an HC he is, or Taylor can't throw for sh!t and we need Carnes, or Bo is a disgrace to this university and should be fired. Just like most don't say Pelini is the best coach on the planet (better than Harbaugh). Though some do and that's to be expected.
What pisses me off is when people take the first comments fairly logical but yet opinionated comments, and try and turn them into the second extreme set of comments and paint the poster out to be a "crappy fan" that "doesn't know the first thing about football". (likely because I didn't play D1 I guess)