huskerjock said:
Marf said:
Blaze1up said:
Timmy has been exposed these last four games and we all found out he is who we thought he was. A FB/QB that can't pass the ball and will be dominated by the Pissburgh D.
So how'd that work out for ya? chuckleshuffle chuckleshuffle chuckleshuffle
Look the Tebow band wagoners finally came out of their caves where they've been hiding at for the past 4 weeks.
Just like the detractors are silent all of the sudden but will be back with a vengeance if he plays poorly next week?
Tom Jackson said it well about a month ago (paraphrasing):
"First they said he couldn't play QB in the NFL.
Then they said he couldn't be a starting QB in the NFL.
Then they said he'd never win the division.
(At the time) Now they're saying he'll never win the Super Bowl.
How rediculous is it that we've gone from 'can't play QB' to even talking about a Super Bowl?"
Tebow has played really well at times. He's played poorly at times. Tell me which other second year QBs to which this does not apply?
Bradford? 8-18 as a starter; 24 TDs, 21 INTs. Tebow is 9-6. Orton was 4-14 with Den last two years.
Clausen? 1-11. 52% completions. 3 TDs, 9 INT. Tebow 47%, 17 TDs, 9 INTs
McCoy? 6-15; 20 TDs, 20 INTs
First-year guys?
Newton? 6-10; 21TDs, 17 INTs
Locker? 51%; 0-3 when he threw more than one pass
Gabbert? 4-10 (thanks to beating Indy twice and TB once); 51%, 12 TDs, 11 INTs
Dalton? 8-8; 58%, 20 TDs, 13 INTs
No other QB is above .500; only Dalton is even close; Only Dalton is above 1.2:1 TD:INT ratio; Tebow is almost 2:1. I wouldn't be surprised if Tebow has more rushing yards than all the others put together. None of that makes Tebow great. Be he has more than earned his playing time.